REVIEW 3 cited by
AI Risk Management Should Incorporate Both Safety and Security
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The exposure of security vulnerabilities in safety-aligned language models, e.g., susceptibility to adversarial attacks, has shed light on the intricate interplay between AI safety and AI security. Although the two disciplines now come together under the overarching goal of AI risk management, they have historically evolved separately, giving rise to differing perspectives. Therefore, in this paper, we advocate that stakeholders in AI risk management should be aware of the nuances, synergies, and interplay between safety and security, and unambiguously take into account the perspectives of both disciplines in order to devise mostly effective and holistic risk mitigation approaches. Unfortunately, this vision is often obfuscated, as the definitions of the basic concepts of "safety" and "security" themselves are often inconsistent and lack consensus across communities. With AI risk management being increasingly cross-disciplinary, this issue is particularly salient. In light of this conceptual challenge, we introduce a unified reference framework to clarify the differences and interplay between AI safety and AI security, aiming to facilitate a shared understanding and effective collaboration across communities.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring the Language Gap to Mitigating It
LLM safety research at ACL venues from 2020 to 2024 is predominantly English-only, and the language gap is growing over time.
-
Robustness tests for biomedical foundation models should tailor to specifications
The paper proposes task-tailored 'robustness specifications' to guide robustness testing of biomedical foundation models across their lifecycle.
-
Trustworthy AI: Safety, Bias, and Privacy -- A Survey
A survey of LLM safety alignment, spurious correlation mitigation, and membership inference defenses, with a self-cited perspective on robust safety.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.