Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Progenitor and explosion properties of SN 2023ixf estimated based on a light-curve model grid of Type II supernovae

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.00928 v2 pith:CHBJCYYU submitted 2024-06-03 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords typeprogenitorpropertiesgridmodelmodelssupernovaeestimate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We estimate the progenitor and explosion properties of the nearby Type II SN 2023ixf using a synthetic model grid of Type II supernova light curves. By comparing the light curves of SN 2023ixf with the pre-existing grid of Type II supernovae containing about 228,000 models with different combinations of the progenitor and explosion properties, we obtain the chi2 value for every model and evaluate the properties of the models providing small values of chi2. We found that the light-curve models with the progenitor zero-age main-sequence mass of 10 Msun, the explosion energy of (2-3)e51 erg, the 56Ni mass of 0.04-0.06 Msun, the mass-loss rate of 1e-3 - 1e-2 Msun/yr with a wind velocity of 10 km/s, and the dense, confined circumstellar matter radius of (6-10)e14 cm match well to the observed light curves of SN 2023ixf. The photospheric velocity evolution of these models is also consistent with the observed velocity evolution. We note that the progenitor mass estimate could be affected by the adopted progenitor models. Although our parameter estimation is based on a pre-existing model grid and we do not perform any additional computations, the estimated parameters are consistent with those obtained by the detailed modeling of SN 2023ixf previously reported. This result shows that comparing the pre-existing model grid is a reasonable way to obtain a rough estimate for the properties of Type II supernovae. This simple way to estimate the properties of Type II supernovae will be essential in the Vera C. Rubin Observatory's Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) era when thousands of Type II supernovae are expected to be discovered yearly.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Surrogate models for type II supernovae: Probing low-energy explosions and interaction-free regimes

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Trained on STELLA grids, two autoencoder-plus-emulator surrogates reconstruct type II SN SEDs at ~1e-4 MSE and recover progenitor masses for SN 2005cs, SN 2012aw, and SN 1999em in minutes.

  2. SN 2023ixf in M101: physical parameters from bolometric light curve modeling

    astro-ph.HE 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    SN 2023ixf produced 0.046 ± 0.007 solar masses of nickel and ejected less than 9 solar masses, based on bolometric light curve modeling.

  3. SN 2023ixf: The Closest Supernova of the Decade

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    SN 2023ixf is a type II supernova that exploded inside dense, confined circumstellar material lost by its red supergiant progenitor in the final years before explosion, as established by synthesizing over 80 published...

Pith tools