Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.01436 v2 pith:POVA4NCS submitted 2024-06-03 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords knowledgeeditingllmsbenchmarkseffectslanguagelargelimitations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge editing is a rising technique for efficiently updating factual knowledge in large language models (LLMs) with minimal alteration of parameters. However, recent studies have identified side effects, such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities, that have emerged after editing. Despite these findings, evaluating the pitfalls of knowledge editing often relies on inconsistent metrics and benchmarks, lacking a uniform standard. In response, this survey presents a comprehensive study of these side effects, providing a unified perspective on the challenges of knowledge editing in LLMs by conducting experiments with consistent metrics and benchmarks. Additionally, we review related works and outline potential research directions to address these limitations. Our survey highlights the limitations of current knowledge editing methods, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of the inner knowledge structures of LLMs and improved knowledge editing methods. To foster future research, we have released the complementary materials publicly in https://github.com/MiuLab/EditLLM-Survey.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking and Rethinking Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Under autoregressive and sequential editing, parameter-based knowledge editing methods perform poorly, while the retrieval-based SCR baseline consistently outperforms them across datasets and models.

Pith tools