REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding Retrieval Robustness for Retrieval-Augmented Image Captioning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent advances in retrieval-augmented models for image captioning highlight the benefit of retrieving related captions for efficient, lightweight models with strong domain-transfer capabilities. While these models demonstrate the success of retrieval augmentation, retrieval models are still far from perfect in practice: the retrieved information can sometimes mislead the model, resulting in incorrect generation and worse performance. In this paper, we analyze the robustness of a retrieval-augmented captioning model SmallCap. Our analysis shows that the model is sensitive to tokens that appear in the majority of the retrieved captions, and the input attribution shows that those tokens are likely copied into the generated output. Given these findings, we propose to train the model by sampling retrieved captions from more diverse sets. This decreases the chance that the model learns to copy majority tokens, and improves both in-domain and cross-domain performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CONCAP: Seeing Beyond English with Concepts Retrieval-Augmented Captioning
CONCAP combines retrieved captions with retrieved concepts to improve multilingual image captioning, reaching 34.2 average CIDEr on XM3600 against 31.8 for Pangea and 25.9 for mBLIP while training on 566K pairs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.