Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Disentangling Logic: The Role of Context in Large Language Model Reasoning Capabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.02787 v1 pith:MG6FPBP6 submitted 2024-06-04 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords reasoninglogiclogicalabstractcapabilitiesdomainsllmsproblems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study intends to systematically disentangle pure logic reasoning and text understanding by investigating the contrast across abstract and contextualized logical problems from a comprehensive set of domains. We explore whether LLMs demonstrate genuine reasoning capabilities across various domains when the underlying logical structure remains constant. We focus on two main questions (1) Can abstract logical problems alone accurately benchmark an LLM's reasoning ability in real-world scenarios, disentangled from contextual support in practical settings? (2) Does fine-tuning LLMs on abstract logic problem generalize to contextualized logic problems and vice versa? To investigate these questions, we focus on standard propositional logic, specifically propositional deductive and abductive logic reasoning. In particular, we construct instantiated datasets for deductive and abductive reasoning with 4 levels of difficulty, encompassing 12 distinct categories or domains based on the categorization of Wikipedia. Our experiments aim to provide insights into disentangling context in logical reasoning and the true reasoning capabilities of LLMs and their generalization potential. The code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/agiresearch/ContextHub.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Token Signature: Predicting Chain-of-Thought Gains with Token Decoding Feature in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The monotonicity of token probabilities during initial decoding predicts chain-of-thought gains, enabling dynamic selection between CoT and direct answers.

  2. RuleArena: A Benchmark for Rule-Guided Reasoning with LLMs in Real-World Scenarios

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RuleArena evaluates LLMs on realistic rule-guided reasoning and finds that even o1-preview solves only about half of the easiest problems and near zero of the hardest.

  3. A Survey on Human-Centric LLMs

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    A review that sorts existing evidence on how well large language models imitate individual human skills and collective social dynamics into one taxonomy.

Pith tools