Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

IrokoBench: A New Benchmark for African Languages in the Age of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.03368 v2 pith:JGO6QKOC submitted 2024-06-05 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languagesafricanmodelsenglishhigh-resourceirokobenchlanguagellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the widespread adoption of Large language models (LLMs), their remarkable capabilities remain limited to a few high-resource languages. Additionally, many low-resource languages (\eg African languages) are often evaluated only on basic text classification tasks due to the lack of appropriate or comprehensive benchmarks outside of high-resource languages. In this paper, we introduce IrokoBench -- a human-translated benchmark dataset for 17 typologically-diverse low-resource African languages covering three tasks: natural language inference~(AfriXNLI), mathematical reasoning~(AfriMGSM), and multi-choice knowledge-based question answering~(AfriMMLU). We use IrokoBench to evaluate zero-shot, few-shot, and translate-test settings~(where test sets are translated into English) across 10 open and six proprietary LLMs. Our evaluation reveals a significant performance gap between high-resource languages~(such as English and French) and low-resource African languages. We observe a significant performance gap between open and proprietary models, with the highest performing open model, Gemma 2 27B only at 63\% of the best-performing proprietary model GPT-4o performance. In addition, machine translating the test set to English before evaluation helped to close the gap for larger models that are English-centric, such as Gemma 2 27B and LLaMa 3.1 70B. These findings suggest that more efforts are needed to develop and adapt LLMs for African languages.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AfriqueLLM: How Data Mixing and Model Architecture Impact Continued Pre-training for African Languages

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training-data mix—not base-model language coverage—was the main driver of improved African-language performance, with Qwen-3 bases gaining the most after continued pre-training.

  2. FormosanBench: Benchmarking Low-Resource Austronesian Languages in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows state-of-the-art LLMs perform poorly on three Taiwanese indigenous languages across MT, ASR, and summarization.

  3. Improving Multilingual Math Reasoning for African Languages

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SFT on translated OpenMathInstruct data outperforms directly generated synthetic data for math in African languages, and combining both yields the best AfriMGSM scores.

  4. Voice of a Continent: Mapping Africa's Speech Technology Frontier

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark and fine-tuned Simba models improve speech recognition, synthesis, and language identification across 61 African languages, but the claimed state of the art lacks comparisons to prior task-specific systems.

  5. Against 'softmaxing' culture

    cs.HC 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A position paper arguing that AI evaluations should shift from defining culture to understanding when culture becomes relationally valid.

  6. mSTEB: Massively Multilingual Evaluation of LLMs on Speech and Text Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    mSTEB is a new 200+ language speech and text benchmark showing that LLMs perform substantially worse on low-resource African and Americas/Oceania languages, especially in speech tasks.

  7. The AI Language Proficiency Monitor -- Tracking the Progress of LLMs on Multilingual Benchmarks

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A continuously updated multilingual benchmark dashboard aggregates existing tasks to rank LLMs across up to 200 languages.

  8. Prompt, Translate, Fine-Tune, Re-Initialize, or Instruction-Tune? Adapting LLMs for In-Context Learning in Low-Resource Languages

    cs.CL 2025-06

Pith tools