Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

DomainRAG: A Chinese Benchmark for Evaluating Domain-specific Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.05654 v2 pith:JP2AXAKL submitted 2024-06-09 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords modelsllmsdomain-specificexpertknowledgeproblemsabilitiesability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) offers a promising solution to address various limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as hallucination and difficulties in keeping up with real-time updates. This approach is particularly critical in expert and domain-specific applications where LLMs struggle to cover expert knowledge. Therefore, evaluating RAG models in such scenarios is crucial, yet current studies often rely on general knowledge sources like Wikipedia to assess the models' abilities in solving common-sense problems. In this paper, we evaluated LLMs by RAG settings in a domain-specific context, college enrollment. We identified six required abilities for RAG models, including the ability in conversational RAG, analyzing structural information, faithfulness to external knowledge, denoising, solving time-sensitive problems, and understanding multi-document interactions. Each ability has an associated dataset with shared corpora to evaluate the RAG models' performance. We evaluated popular LLMs such as Llama, Baichuan, ChatGLM, and GPT models. Experimental results indicate that existing closed-book LLMs struggle with domain-specific questions, highlighting the need for RAG models to solve expert problems. Moreover, there is room for RAG models to improve their abilities in comprehending conversational history, analyzing structural information, denoising, processing multi-document interactions, and faithfulness in expert knowledge. We expect future studies could solve these problems better.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quasiparticle interference in LiFeAs: Signature of inelastic tunneling through spin fluctuations

    cond-mat.supr-con 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Replica QPI features in LiFeAs are attributed to inelastic tunneling through spin fluctuations at 8 to 10 meV, matching neutron scattering.

  2. Generating Diverse Q&A Benchmarks for RAG Evaluation with DataMorgana

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DataMorgana, a configurable LLM-based generator, produces synthetic Q&A benchmarks with higher lexical, syntactic, and semantic diversity than several existing methods.

  3. Position: Text Embeddings Should Capture Implicit Semantics, Not Just Surface Meaning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    State-of-the-art text embeddings lag far behind on tasks requiring pragmatic inference, stance detection, and social meaning, relative to their strong performance on surface semantic benchmarks.

Pith tools