REVIEW 2 cited by
CodecFake: Enhancing Anti-Spoofing Models Against Deepfake Audios from Codec-Based Speech Synthesis Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Current state-of-the-art (SOTA) codec-based audio synthesis systems can mimic anyone's voice with just a 3-second sample from that specific unseen speaker. Unfortunately, malicious attackers may exploit these technologies, causing misuse and security issues. Anti-spoofing models have been developed to detect fake speech. However, the open question of whether current SOTA anti-spoofing models can effectively counter deepfake audios from codec-based speech synthesis systems remains unanswered. In this paper, we curate an extensive collection of contemporary SOTA codec models, employing them to re-create synthesized speech. This endeavor leads to the creation of CodecFake, the first codec-based deepfake audio dataset. Additionally, we verify that anti-spoofing models trained on commonly used datasets cannot detect synthesized speech from current codec-based speech generation systems. The proposed CodecFake dataset empowers these models to counter this challenge effectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neural Codec Source Tracing: Toward Comprehensive Attribution in Open-Set Condition
A new open-set neural codec source tracing benchmark and dataset shows strong in-distribution classification and OOD detection, but poor generalization to unseen real audio.
-
Bona fide Cross Testing Reveals Weak Spot in Audio Deepfake Detection Systems
A new evaluation protocol exhaustively pairs 164 speech synthesizers with nine bona fide speech types and reports max-pooled EERs, revealing larger failures than pooled averages show.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.