REVIEW 9 cited by
MobileAgentBench: An Efficient and User-Friendly Benchmark for Mobile LLM Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based mobile agents are increasingly popular due to their capability to interact directly with mobile phone Graphic User Interfaces (GUIs) and their potential to autonomously manage daily tasks. Despite their promising prospects in both academic and industrial sectors, little research has focused on benchmarking the performance of existing mobile agents, due to the inexhaustible states of apps and the vague definition of feasible action sequences. To address this challenge, we propose an efficient and user-friendly benchmark, MobileAgentBench, designed to alleviate the burden of extensive manual testing. We initially define 100 tasks across 10 open-source apps, categorized by multiple levels of difficulty. Subsequently, we evaluate several existing mobile agents, including AppAgent and MobileAgent, to thoroughly and systematically compare their performance. All materials are accessible on our project webpage: https://MobileAgentBench.github.io, contributing to the advancement of both academic and industrial fields.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
MobiBench: Multi-Branch, Modular Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents
MobiBench reaches near-human offline evaluation fidelity for mobile GUI agents by accepting any valid action at each step, and enables modular attribution of performance to agent components.
-
Measuring the Security of Mobile LLM Agents under Adversarial Prompts from Untrusted Third-Party Channels
Indirect prompt injection through ads, webviews, and notifications reliably diverts mobile LLM agents into leaking data and installing malware across eight evaluated agents.
-
A Pilot Study on LLM-Based Agentic Translation from Android to iOS: Pitfalls and Insights
A five-project pilot study found that a GPT-4o agent pipeline translates 70.7% of Android files to valid Swift after automated validation, with failures concentrated in internal references and platform-specific APIs.
-
What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent Capabilities
A self-generating graph benchmark produces 36k GUI agent tasks with controllable complexity and ten capability scores, and fine-tuning on its trajectories gives small gains on AndroidControl and OmniAct.
-
Atomic-to-Compositional Generalization for Mobile Agents with A New Benchmark and Scheduling System
AI phone agents succeed on single-step commands but fail on multi-step compositions; a new benchmark measures this gap and a scheduler that decomposes tasks recovers most of it.
-
TextAtari: 100K Frames Game Playing with Language Agents
TextAtari is a text-based Atari benchmark for language agents; 7-8B LLMs stay below 10% of human scores in over 90% of tested conditions, and knowledge injection helps more than chain-of-thought.
-
VLM-3D:End-to-End Vision-Language Models for Open-World 3D Perception
The paper promises VLM-3D but the body text is entirely the MVISU-Bench mobile-agent benchmark paper, so the stated result is unsupported.
-
Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey
A review that proposes a two-dimensional taxonomy for evaluating LLM agents and highlights enterprise-specific evaluation gaps.
-
Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.