Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Question-Answering (QA) Model for a Personalized Learning Assistant for Arabic Language

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08519 v1 pith:MJUY7IZI submitted 2024-06-11 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords modelarabiclearningpalestinianquestionssciencescoreassistant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper describes the creation, optimization, and assessment of a question-answering (QA) model for a personalized learning assistant that uses BERT transformers customized for the Arabic language. The model was particularly finetuned on science textbooks in Palestinian curriculum. Our approach uses BERT's brilliant capabilities to automatically produce correct answers to questions in the field of science education. The model's ability to understand and extract pertinent information is improved by finetuning it using 11th and 12th grade biology book in Palestinian curriculum. This increases the model's efficacy in producing enlightening responses. Exact match (EM) and F1 score metrics are used to assess the model's performance; the results show an EM score of 20% and an F1 score of 51%. These findings show that the model can comprehend and react to questions in the context of Palestinian science book. The results demonstrate the potential of BERT-based QA models to support learning and understanding Arabic students questions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging Explainable AI for LLM Text Attribution: Differentiating Human-Written and Multiple LLMs-Generated Text

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    On a 600-essay, two-topic dataset, TF-IDF features let a Random Forest identify which of five LLMs or a human wrote a text with about 97% accuracy, though the comparison to GPTZero is inconsistent.

Pith tools