Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Volatility Forecasting Using Similarity-based Parameter Correction and Aggregated Shock Information

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08738 v3 pith:D7YXVCGM submitted 2024-06-13 stat.ME stat.AP

classification stat.MEstat.AP
keywords volatilityseriesshockseffectsforecastingshocksimilarity-basedtime
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We develop a procedure for forecasting the volatility of a time series immediately following a news shock. Adapting the similarity-based framework of Lin and Eck (2020), we exploit series that have experienced similar shocks. We aggregate their shock-induced excess volatilities by positing the shocks to be affine functions of exogenous covariates. The volatility shocks are modeled as random effects and estimated as fixed effects. The aggregation of these estimates is done in service of adjusting the $h$-step-ahead GARCH forecast of the time series under study by an additive term. The adjusted and unadjusted forecasts are evaluated using the unobservable but easily-estimated realized volatility (RV). A real-world application is provided, as are simulation results suggesting the conditions and hyperparameters under which our method thrives.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dual Interpretation of Machine Learning Forecasts

    econ.EM 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified dual-space decomposition turns machine learning forecasts into weighted combinations of historical observations, with weights interpretable as proximity scores and portfolio-like diagnostics.

Pith tools