pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.09715 · v3 · submitted 2024-06-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Contextuality in anomalous heat flow

Naim Elias Comar , Danilo Cius , Luis Felipe Santos , Rafael Wagner , B\'arbara Amaral This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords contextualityanomalous heat flownoncontextuality inequalitiesquantum thermodynamicsprepare-transform-measure protocolssequential transformationsheat flow observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

Anomalous heat flow occurs in quantum protocols only when noncontextuality inequalities are violated before a critical time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that in certain quantum prepare-transform-measure protocols with sequential transformations, anomalous heat flow from cold to hot systems happens only if the data violates a noncontextuality inequality. This creates a direct link between the thermodynamic anomaly and contextuality, going beyond cases where classical randomness alone suffices. The connection is restricted to evolution times shorter than a critical value τ_c derived from the protocol parameters. The authors extend existing noncontextuality inequalities to sequential settings and apply the result both to a published experiment and to two-qutrit systems.

Core claim

In a class of quantum prepare-transform-measure protocols, anomalous heat flow occurs exclusively within the time interval from zero to a critical time τ_c if and only if the corresponding noncontextuality inequality is violated. This follows from extending standard noncontextuality inequalities to sequential transformations and applying them directly to the observables that quantify heat exchange between initially correlated thermal states.

What carries the argument

The noncontextuality inequality extended to sequential transformations, which acts as a witness that anomalous heat flow requires contextuality in the given time window.

If this is right

  • Absence of a noncontextuality violation rules out anomalous heat flow for all times before τ_c.
  • The critical time τ_c computed from experimental parameters marks the upper limit of the claimed implication.
  • The same necessity holds when the systems are two qutrits rather than two qubits.
  • The published parameters of one earlier heat-flow experiment determine a concrete value of τ_c.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Thermodynamic heat-flow measurements could function as a practical test for contextuality.
  • Analogous critical times might appear when contextuality is linked to other thermodynamic quantities such as extractable work.
  • The prepare-transform-measure structure could be used to search for similar necessity relations in open quantum systems.

Load-bearing premise

The known noncontextuality inequalities extend to sequential transformations and apply to heat flow observables without further assumptions on the initial state or dynamics.

What would settle it

An experiment that records anomalous heat flow in the interval (0, τ_c) while satisfying every noncontextuality inequality would falsify the claimed necessity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2406.09715 by B\'arbara Amaral, Danilo Cius, Luis Felipe Santos, Naim Elias Comar, Rafael Wagner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch of our main result. A ‘hot’ qubit is at tem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: is zoomed in so that the values of ⟨QA⟩ appear to be a line when they are described by a periodic function. This implies that in fact there are various critical time intervals ∆τij = (τ i c , τ j c ) in which the reversal of heat flow witnesses quantum contextuality. Finally, while we have focused on the linear regime due to the experimental parameters, in principle different choices of parameters could al… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In classical thermodynamics, heat must spontaneously flow from hot to cold systems. In quantum thermodynamics, the same law applies when considering multipartite product thermal states evolving unitarily. If initial correlations are present, anomalous heat flow can happen, temporarily making cold thermal states colder and hot thermal states hotter. Such effect can happen due to entanglement, but also because of classical randomness, hence lacking a direct connection with nonclassicality. In this work, we introduce scenarios where anomalous heat flow \emph{does} have a direct link to nonclassicality, defined to be the failure of noncontextual models to explain experimental data. We start by extending known noncontextuality inequalities to a setup where sequential transformations are considered. We then show a class of quantum prepare-transform-measure protocols, characterized by time intervals $(0,\tau_c)$ for a given critical time $\tau_c$, where anomalous heat flow happens only if a noncontextuality inequality is violated. We also analyze a recent experiment from Micadei et. al. [Nat. Commun. 10, 2456 (2019)] and find the critical time $\tau_c$ based on their experimental parameters. We conclude by investigating heat flow in the evolution of two qutrit systems, showing that our findings are not an artifact of using two-qubit systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in a class of quantum prepare-transform-measure protocols, anomalous heat flow occurs only if a noncontextuality inequality is violated, specifically for time intervals (0, τ_c) where τ_c is a critical time derived from experimental parameters. The authors extend existing noncontextuality inequalities to setups involving sequential transformations, apply the framework to reanalyze the Micadei et al. (2019) experiment, and verify that the findings hold for two-qutrit systems rather than being limited to qubits.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the result is significant because it identifies a direct connection between anomalous heat flow and nonclassicality (defined via failure of noncontextual models), distinguishing these scenarios from cases explainable by entanglement or classical randomness alone. The explicit link to an existing experiment via computation of τ_c and the check for qutrits provide concrete applicability and generality.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section introducing sequential noncontextuality inequalities] The extension of noncontextuality inequalities to sequential transformations (detailed in the section introducing the prepare-transform-measure protocols) requires explicit verification that the heat-flow observables can be substituted without additional assumptions on the initial state or unitary dynamics; the 'only if' direction of the claim rests on this step.
  2. [Section analyzing the Micadei et al. experiment] In the analysis of the Micadei et al. experiment, the computation of τ_c from the reported parameters must be shown to be robust to small variations in the measured temperatures or coupling strengths, as this value demarcates the regime where the contextuality link holds.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] Notation for the critical time τ_c and the time intervals should be introduced with a clear definition in the abstract and introduction to avoid ambiguity when first referenced.
  2. [Section on two-qutrit systems] The two-qutrit numerical results would benefit from an explicit statement of the Hilbert-space dimension and the form of the initial thermal states used in the simulation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section introducing sequential noncontextuality inequalities] The extension of noncontextuality inequalities to sequential transformations (detailed in the section introducing the prepare-transform-measure protocols) requires explicit verification that the heat-flow observables can be substituted without additional assumptions on the initial state or unitary dynamics; the 'only if' direction of the claim rests on this step.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The derivation in the manuscript relies on the fact that the heat-flow observables are linear combinations of the prepare-transform-measure probabilities, which are the operational quantities in the noncontextuality framework. The substitution follows directly from the definition without requiring extra assumptions on the state or dynamics beyond the unitary evolution and thermal initial states specified. However, to make this verification explicit as requested, we will add a dedicated paragraph or appendix subsection detailing the substitution step and confirming the absence of additional assumptions. This will clarify the 'only if' direction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section analyzing the Micadei et al. experiment] In the analysis of the Micadei et al. experiment, the computation of τ_c from the reported parameters must be shown to be robust to small variations in the measured temperatures or coupling strengths, as this value demarcates the regime where the contextuality link holds.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating robustness enhances the reliability of the result. In the current manuscript, τ_c is computed using the reported experimental parameters from Micadei et al. To address this concern, we will perform and include a sensitivity analysis in the revised version, showing how τ_c varies with small perturbations (e.g., 1-10% changes) in temperatures and coupling strengths. This will confirm that the existence of the interval (0, τ_c) remains valid under reasonable experimental uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation is self-contained with no circular reductions

full rationale

The paper extends known noncontextuality inequalities to sequential transformations in prepare-transform-measure protocols and shows that anomalous heat flow occurs in (0, τ_c) only upon violation of the extended inequality. τ_c is computed from the parameters of the externally cited Micadei et al. experiment rather than fitted to the target observable. No load-bearing step reduces the claimed link to a self-definition, a renamed empirical pattern, or a self-citation chain; the central result follows from the stated structure and the inequality extension without circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum mechanics, the definition of noncontextuality, and the validity of extending noncontextuality inequalities to sequential operations. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Noncontextuality inequalities can be extended to sequential prepare-transform-measure protocols while preserving their validity as tests for nonclassicality.
    Invoked when stating that anomalous heat flow occurs only if the inequality is violated.
  • standard math The initial states and unitary evolution are described by standard quantum mechanics.
    Background assumption for all quantum thermodynamic statements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1374 out tokens · 22518 ms · 2026-05-24T00:07:54.638138+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 107 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Its action is operationally characterized by p(k|M, Tid, P) = p(k|M, P ) (14) for all possible preparation procedures P ∈ P and all possible measurement effectsk|M ∈ K × M

    Noncontextuality inequalities for the average of theory-independent observables In any operational theory, there is a specific transfor- mation procedure denotedTid that denotes the ‘identity’ transformation. Its action is operationally characterized by p(k|M, Tid, P) = p(k|M, P ) (14) for all possible preparation procedures P ∈ P and all possible measure...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Non-resonant case (HA ̸= HB): There exists a quantum channel C such that 1 2 UI + 1 2 U † I = (1 − pd)id + pdC (28) where UI(·) = UI(t)(·)UI(t)†, UI(t) = e−itHI, and 0 ≤ pd ≤ 1

    work page

  3. [3]

    We prove this result in Appendix C

    Resonant case (HA = HB): The unitary evolution UI(t) can be written as a composition of two other unitaries UI(t) = U2 ◦ U1, and there exist quantum channels C1, C2 such that 1 2 U1 + 1 2 U † 1 = (1 − pd1)id + pd1 C1, (29) 1 2 U2 + 1 2 U † 2 = (1 − pd2)id + pd2 C2, (30) where Ui(·) = Ui(·)U † i, and0 ≤ pdi ≤ 1 for i = 1, 2. We prove this result in Appendi...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Generalized contextuality without measurement incompatibility The above calculations allow us to draw a simple yet remarkable conclusion. We can consider a frag- ment of quantum theory that has (i) unitary evolutions U(t), U(t)†, together with the identity map and some other channel C, for a fixed time t, (ii) a single mea- surement protocolcharacterized ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Using Theorem 3, we now study violations of the generalized noncontextuality obtained when there is heat exchanged between two qubits,HA = C2 = HB

    Contextuality as a resource for anomalous heat flow We will now show that contextuality allows for anoma- lous quantum heat transfer beyond whatany noncontex- tual model is capable of. Using Theorem 3, we now study violations of the generalized noncontextuality obtained when there is heat exchanged between two qubits,HA = C2 = HB. They are described local...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Small gt 9 〈QA〉 ℬnc 0.05 0.1 0.15 τc 0.2 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Interaction time (ms) Heat (peV) Figure 2

    Connection with experimental results We claimed that for fixed values ofg there are critical times τc that can be found, such that for any0 < t < τ c the noncontextual inequality is violated for this class of two-qubit interactions we have just studied. Small gt 9 〈QA〉 ℬnc 0.05 0.1 0.15 τc 0.2 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Interaction time (ms) Heat (peV) Figure...

    work page

  7. [7]

    A simple family of unitary evolutions satisfying stochastic reversibility We say that a Hermitian operator K = K † is also involutory when K2 = 1. From Stones theorem, any family of unitary operators {U(t)}t can be written as U = e−itK for some K self-adjoint, and for the cases when K is also involutory we can show that it satisfies stochastic reversibili...

    work page

  8. [8]

    (2)) is thepartial SWAPdefined as UP S(t) := e−igtS , (43) where S is the SWAP operator [80], andg > 0

    Partial SWAP A unitary that satisfies this condition and energy con- servation (Eq. (2)) is thepartial SWAPdefined as UP S(t) := e−igtS , (43) where S is the SWAP operator [80], andg > 0. Since the SWAP operator is described by an involutory matrix, i.e., S2 = 1, Proposition 1 applies toe−igtS, where UP S(t) = cos(gt)1 − i sin(gt)S. (44) By direct calcula...

    work page

  9. [9]

    An intriguing model for examination involves the interplay between two qutrits mediated by a SWAP gate

    Heat flow during a partial SWAP of two qutrits The partial SWAP unitary can be useful to obtain non- contextuality inequalities for higher dimensional systems since it satisfies the stochastic reversibility condition in any dimension where S is well-defined. An intriguing model for examination involves the interplay between two qutrits mediated by a SWAP ...

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Callen,Thermodynamics & an Introduction to Ther- mostatistics, Student Edition (Wiley India Pvt

    H. Callen,Thermodynamics & an Introduction to Ther- mostatistics, Student Edition (Wiley India Pvt. Limited, 2006)

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    Blundell and K

    S. Blundell and K. Blundell, Concepts in Thermal Physics (OUP Oxford, 2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World(Cre- ative Media Partners, LLC, 2018)

    A. Eddington, The Nature of the Physical World(Cre- ative Media Partners, LLC, 2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Jennings and T

    D. Jennings and T. Rudolph, Entanglement and the ther- modynamic arrow of time, Phys. Rev. E 81, 061130 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    The Arrow of Time and Correlations in Quantum Physics

    V. Vedral, The Arrow of Time an d Correlations in Quan- tum Physics, arXiv:1605.00926 [quant-ph] (2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Lipka-Bartosik, G

    P. Lipka-Bartosik, G. F. Diotallevi, and P. Bakhshinezhad, Fundamental limits on anoma- lous energy flows in correlated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 140402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Leff and A

    H. Leff and A. Rex,Maxwell’s Demon: Entropy, Infor- mation, Computing (Adam Hilger, 1990)

    work page 1990

  17. [17]

    Leff and A

    H. Leff and A. Rex,Maxwell’s Demon 2 Entropy, Classi- cal and Quantum Information, Computing(CRC Press, 2002)

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    Rex, Maxwell’s Demon—A Historical Review, En- tropy 19, 240 (2017)

    A. Rex, Maxwell’s Demon—A Historical Review, En- tropy 19, 240 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Lloyd, Use of mutual information to decrease entropy: Implicationsforthesecondlawofthermodynamics,Phys

    S. Lloyd, Use of mutual information to decrease entropy: Implicationsforthesecondlawofthermodynamics,Phys. Rev. A39, 5378 (1989)

    work page 1989

  20. [20]

    M. H. Partovi, Entanglement versus stosszahlansatz: Disappearance of the thermodynamic arrow in a high- correlation environment, Phys. Rev. E77, 021110 (2008)

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    M. N. Bera, A. Riera, M. Lewenstein, and A. Winter, Generalized laws of thermodynamics in the presence of correlations, Nature Communications8, 2180 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Jevtic, D

    S. Jevtic, D. Jennings, and T. Rudolph, Maximally and Minimally Correlated States Attainable within a Closed Evolving System, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 110403 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Levy and M

    A. Levy and M. Lostaglio, Quasiprobability distribution for heat fluctuations in the quantum regime, PRX Quan- tum 1, 010309 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Jevtic, T

    S. Jevtic, T. Rudolph, D. Jennings, Y. Hirono, S. Nakayama, and M. Murao, Exchange fluctuation the- orem for correlated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E92, 042113 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Sagawa and M

    T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Fluctuation theorem with in- formation exchange: Role of correlations in stochastic thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 180602 (2012)

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    J. V. Koski, V. F. Maisi, T. Sagawa, and J. P. Pekola, Experimental observation of the role of mutual informa- tion in the nonequilibrium dynamics of a maxwell demon, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 030601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Cai, Y.-J

    J. Cai, Y.-J. Xia, and Z.-X. Man, Reversal of heat flow and extraction of work by means of initial correlations within open quantum systems, Physics Letters A501, 129389 (2024)

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Henao and R

    I. Henao and R. M. Serra, Role of quantum coherence in the thermodynamics of energy transfer, Physical Review E 97, 10.1103/physreve.97.062105 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.97.062105 2018

  29. [29]

    Micadei, J

    K. Micadei, J. P. S. Peterson, A. M. Souza, R. S. Sarthour, I. S. Oliveira, G. T. Landi, T. B. Batalhão, R. M. Serra, and E. Lutz, Reversing the direction of heat flow using quantum correlations, Nature Commu- nications 10, 2456 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    R. W. Spekkens, Contextuality for preparations, trans- formations, and unsharp measurements, Phys. Rev. A 71, 052108 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    R. W. Spekkens, The ontological identity of empirical in- discernibles: Leibniz’s methodological principle and its significance in the work of Einstein, arXiv:1909.04628 [physics.hist-ph] (2019)

    work page arXiv 1909

  32. [32]

    R. D. Baldijão, R. Wagner, C. Duarte, B. Amaral, and M. T. Cunha, Emergence of Noncontextuality under Quantum Darwinism, PRX Quantum2, 030351 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Budroni, A

    C. Budroni, A. Cabello, O. Gühne, M. Kleinmann, and J.-A. Larsson, Kochen–Specker contextuality, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045007 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Kunjwal, Contextuality beyond the Kochen-Specker theorem, arXiv:1612.07250 [quant-ph] (2016)

    R. Kunjwal, Contextuality beyond the Kochen-Specker theorem, arXiv:1612.07250 [quant-ph] (2016)

    work page arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    M. S. Leifer and O. J. E. Maroney, Maximally Epistemic Interpretations of the Quantum State and Contextuality, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 120401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Lostaglio, Certifying Quantum Signatures in Thermo- dynamics and Metrology via Contextuality of Quantum Linear Response, Phys

    M. Lostaglio, Certifying Quantum Signatures in Thermo- dynamics and Metrology via Contextuality of Quantum Linear Response, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 230603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    R.W.Spekkens,NegativityandContextualityareEquiv- alent Notions of Nonclassicality, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 020401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    D.Schmid, J.H.Selby, M.F.Pusey,andR.W.Spekkens, A structure theorem for generalized-noncontextual onto- logical models, Quantum8, 1283 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Schmid, R

    D. Schmid, R. D. Baldijão, Y. Y¯ ıng, R. Wagner, and J. H. Selby, Kirkwood-Dirac representations beyond quantum states (and their relation to noncontextuality), arXiv:2405.04573 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Khoshbin, L

    M. Khoshbin, L. Catani, and M. Leifer, Alternative ro- bust ways of witnessing nonclassicality in the simplest scenario, Phys. Rev. A109, 032212 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    J. H. Selby, E. Wolfe, D. Schmid, A. B. Sainz, and V. P. Rossi, Linear program for testing nonclassicality and an open-source implementation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 050202 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    V. P. Rossi, D. Schmid, J. H. Selby, and A. B. Sainz, Contextuality with vanishing coherence and maximal ro- bustness to dephasing, Phys. Rev. A108, 032213 (2023). 13

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    A. M. Fonseca, V. P. Rossi, R. D. Baldijão, J. H. Selby, and A. B. Sainz, Robustness of contextuality under dif- ferent types of noise as quantifiers for parity-oblivious multiplexing tasks, arXiv:2406.12773 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    M. D. Mazurek, M. F. Pusey, R. Kunjwal, K. J. Resch, and R. W. Spekkens, An experimental test of noncontex- tuality without unphysical idealizations, Nature commu- nications 7, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    M. D. Mazurek, M. F. Pusey, K. J. Resch, and R. W. Spekkens, Experimentally Bounding Deviations From Quantum Theory in the Landscape of Generalized Prob- abilistic Theories, PRX Quantum2, 020302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    Giordani, R

    T. Giordani, R. Wagner, C. Esposito, A. Camillini, F. Hoch, G. Carvacho, C. Pentangelo, F. Ceccarelli, S. Piacentini, A. Crespi, N. Spagnolo, R. Osellame, E. F. Galvão, and F. Sciarrino, Experimental certifi- cation of contextuality, coherence, and dimension in a programmable universal photonic processor, Science Ad- vances9, eadj4249 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Duarte and B

    C. Duarte and B. Amaral, Resource theory of contex- tuality for arbitrary prepare-and-measure experiments, Journal of Mathematical Physics59, 062202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    R.Wagner, R.D.Baldijão, A.Tezzin,andB.Amaral,Us- ing a resource theoretic perspective to witness and engi- neer quantum generalized contextuality for prepare-and- measure scenarios, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical56, 505303 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Resource-theoretic hierarchy of contextuality for general probabilistic theories

    L. Catani, T. D. Galley, and T. Gonda, Resource- theoretic hierarchy of contextuality for general proba- bilistic theories, arXiv:2406.00717 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    R. W. Spekkens, Evidence for the epistemic view of quan- tum states: A toy theory, Phys. Rev. A 75, 032110 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [51]

    Disentangling Nonlocality and Teleportation

    L. Hardy, Disentangling Nonlocality and Teleportation, arXiv:quant-ph/9906123 (1999)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    Catani, M

    L. Catani, M. Leifer, D. Schmid, and R. W. Spekkens, Why interference phenomena do not capture the essence of quantum theory, Quantum7, 1119 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, Recon- struction of Gaussian quantum mechanics from Liouville mechanics with an epistemic restriction, Phys. Rev. A 86, 012103 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    Schmid, H

    D. Schmid, H. Du, J. H. Selby, and M. F. Pusey, Unique- ness of noncontextual models for stabilizer subtheories, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 120403 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Deffner and S

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Quantum Thermodynam- ics: An introduction to the thermodynamics of quantum information, arXiv:1907.01596 [quant-ph] (2019)

    work page arXiv 1907

  56. [56]

    Binder, L

    F. Binder, L. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso, Thermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions, Fundamental Theories of Physics (Springer International Publishing, 2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Goold, M

    J. Goold, M. Huber, A. Riera, L. d. Rio, and P. Skrzypczyk, The role of quantum information in ther- modynamics—a topical review, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49, 143001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Vinjanampathy and J

    S. Vinjanampathy and J. Anders, Quantum thermody- namics, Contemporary Physics57, 545–579 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Introduction to Quantum Thermodynamics: History and Prospects

    R. Alicki and R. Kosloff, Introduction to Quantum Ther- modynamics: History and Prospects, arXiv:1801.08314 [quant-ph] (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Kosloff, Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint, Entropy15, 2100–2128 (2013)

    R. Kosloff, Quantum thermodynamics: A dynamical viewpoint, Entropy15, 2100–2128 (2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    Millen and A

    J. Millen and A. Xuereb, Perspective on quantum ther- modynamics, New Journal of Physics18, 011002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    Upadhyaya, J

    T. Upadhyaya, J. a. William F. Braasch, G. T. Landi, and N. Y. Halpern, What happens to entropy produc- tion when conserved quantities fail to commute with each other, arXiv:2305.15480 [quant-ph] (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    Lostaglio, Quantum fluctuation theorems, contextu- ality, and work quasiprobabilities, Phys

    M. Lostaglio, Quantum fluctuation theorems, contextu- ality, and work quasiprobabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 040602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Lostaglio, An introductory review of the resource the- ory approach to thermodynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 114001 (2019)

    M. Lostaglio, An introductory review of the resource the- ory approach to thermodynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 114001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    G.T.LandiandM.Paternostro,Irreversibleentropypro- duction: From classical to quantum, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035008 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [66]

    Clausius, Ueber eine veränderte form des zweiten hauptsatzes der mechanischen wärmetheorie, Annalen der Physik169, 481–506 (1854)

    R. Clausius, Ueber eine veränderte form des zweiten hauptsatzes der mechanischen wärmetheorie, Annalen der Physik169, 481–506 (1854)

    work page

  67. [67]

    Clausius, Ueber verschiedene für die anwendung be- queme formen der hauptgleichungen der mechanischen wärmetheorie, Annalen der Physik201, 353–400 (1865)

    R. Clausius, Ueber verschiedene für die anwendung be- queme formen der hauptgleichungen der mechanischen wärmetheorie, Annalen der Physik201, 353–400 (1865)

    work page

  68. [68]

    Harrigan and R

    N. Harrigan and R. W. Spekkens, Einstein, Incomplete- ness, and the Epistemic View of quantum states, Found. Phys. 40, 125 (2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    Kunjwal, Beyond the Cabello-Severini-Winter frame- work: Making sense of contextuality without sharpness of measurements, Quantum3, 184 (2019)

    R. Kunjwal, Beyond the Cabello-Severini-Winter frame- work: Making sense of contextuality without sharpness of measurements, Quantum3, 184 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    Schmid, J

    D. Schmid, J. H. Selby, and R. W. Spekkens, Unscram- bling the omelette of causation and inference: The frame- work of causal-inferential theories, arXiv:2009.03297 [quant-ph] (2021)

    work page arXiv 2009

  71. [71]

    Banik, S

    M. Banik, S. S. Bhattacharya, S. K. Choudhary, A. Mukherjee, and A. Roy, Ontological models, prepa- ration contextuality and nonlocality, Foundations of Physics 44, 1230–1244 (2014)

    work page 2014

  72. [72]

    Schmid, R

    D. Schmid, R. W. Spekkens, and E. Wolfe, All the noncontextuality inequalities for arbitrary prepare-and- measure experiments with respect to any fixed set of op- erational equivalences, Phys. Rev. A97, 062103 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Wagner, R

    R. Wagner, R. S. Barbosa, and E. F. Galvão, Inequali- ties witnessing coherence, nonlocality, and contextuality, Phys. Rev. A109, 032220 (2024)

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    M. F. Pusey, Robust preparation noncontextuality in- equalities in the simplest scenario, Phys. Rev. A 98, 022112 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Nielsen and I

    M. Nielsen and I. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition(Cam- bridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  76. [76]

    M. M. Wilde,Quantum information theory(Cambridge university press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    R. W. Spekkens, D. H. Buzacott, A. J. Keehn, B. Toner, and G. J. Pryde, Preparation Contextuality Powers Parity-Oblivious Multiplexing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 010401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    Saha and A

    D. Saha and A. Chaturvedi, Preparation contextuality as an essential feature underlying quantum communication advantage, Phys. Rev. A100, 022108 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    Schmid and R

    D. Schmid and R. W. Spekkens, Contextual advantage for state discrimination, Phys. Rev. X8, 011015 (2018)

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    Flatt, H

    K. Flatt, H. Lee, C. R. I. Carceller, J. B. Brask, and J. Bae, Contextual advantages and certification for maximum-confidence discrimination, PRX Quantum3, 030337 (2022). 14

    work page 2022

Showing first 80 references.