pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.00717 · v3 · submitted 2024-06-02 · 🪐 quant-ph

Resource-theoretic hierarchy of contextuality for general probabilistic theories

Lorenzo Catani , Thomas D. Galley , Tom\'a\v{s} Gonda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 00:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords contextualitygeneral probabilistic theoriesresource theoryhierarchyprepare-and-measure scenariosparity oblivious multiplexingclassical excessunivalent simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A resource theory defines a hierarchy ordering general probabilistic theories by their degree of contextuality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a hierarchy of contextuality that goes beyond the usual yes-or-no classification for theories described by general probabilistic theories in prepare-and-measure experiments. It does this by building a resource theory where the free operations include only classical systems and univalent simulations that keep operational equivalences intact. Noncontextual theories sit at the base of this ordering. Classical excess serves as one monotone by measuring how far a theory is from being embeddable in a classical system without error. The success rate in a specific game, parity oblivious multiplexing, provides another monotone that respects the ordering.

Core claim

We present a hierarchy of generalized contextuality defined as the resource ordering of a novel resource theory of GPT-contextuality. The building blocks of its free operations are classical systems and univalent simulations between GPTs. These simulations preserve operational equivalences and thus cannot generate contextuality. Noncontextual theories can be recovered as least elements in the hierarchy. We then define a new contextuality monotone, called classical excess, given by the minimal error of embedding a GPT within an infinite classical system. In addition, we show that the optimal success probability in the parity oblivious multiplexing game also defines a monotone in our resource

What carries the argument

The resource theory of GPT-contextuality whose free operations are classical systems and univalent simulations that preserve operational equivalences.

If this is right

  • Noncontextual theories are recovered as the least elements in the hierarchy.
  • Classical excess, the minimal embedding error into an infinite classical system, is a contextuality monotone.
  • The optimal success probability in the parity oblivious multiplexing game is a monotone in the resource theory.
  • Non-free operations may be understood as implementing information erasure that explains the fine-tuning aspect of contextuality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The hierarchy could support quantitative comparisons of contextuality across specific GPTs such as quantum theory and boxworld.
  • The monotones might bound performance in information tasks other than parity oblivious multiplexing.
  • Linking non-free operations to erasure could connect the theory to information-theoretic explanations of contextuality.

Load-bearing premise

Univalent simulations between GPTs preserve operational equivalences and therefore cannot generate contextuality.

What would settle it

An explicit univalent simulation that maps a noncontextual GPT to a contextual one while preserving equivalences, or a pair of theories where classical excess fails to respect the free operations.

read the original abstract

In this work we present a hierarchy of generalized contextuality. It refines the traditional binary distinction between contextual and noncontextual theories, and facilitates their comparison based on how contextual they are. Our approach focuses on the contextuality of prepare-and-measure scenarios, described by general probabilistic theories (GPTs). To motivate the hierarchy, we define it as the resource ordering of a novel resource theory of GPT-contextuality. The building blocks of its free operations are classical systems and univalent simulations between GPTs. These simulations preserve operational equivalences and thus cannot generate contextuality. Noncontextual theories can be recovered as least elements in the hierarchy. We then define a new contextuality monotone, called classical excess, given by the minimal error of embedding a GPT within an infinite classical system. In addition, we show that the optimal success probability in the parity oblivious multiplexing game also defines a monotone in our resource theory. Finally, we discuss whether the non-free operations can be understood as implementing information erasure and thus explaining the fine-tuning aspect of contextuality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a hierarchy of generalized contextuality in general probabilistic theories (GPTs) by constructing a resource theory where the free operations are compositions of classical systems and univalent simulations between GPTs. These are claimed to preserve operational equivalences and thus not generate contextuality, making noncontextual theories the minimal elements. It introduces the 'classical excess' monotone as the minimal embedding error into an infinite classical system and shows that the optimal success probability in the parity oblivious multiplexing (POM) game is a monotone. The paper concludes with a discussion on whether non-free operations correspond to information erasure explaining fine-tuning in contextuality.

Significance. If the construction is sound, this work offers a quantitative resource-theoretic framework for comparing the degree of contextuality across different GPTs, extending beyond the binary contextual/noncontextual distinction. The provision of explicit monotones like classical excess and the POM game success probability strengthens its potential utility in quantum foundations and information processing.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 (resource theory of GPT-contextuality)] The central claim that univalent simulations preserve operational equivalences and therefore cannot generate contextuality (and hence that noncontextual GPTs are least elements) is load-bearing for the entire hierarchy. The abstract asserts this follows from preservation of equivalences, but without an explicit preservation theorem showing that no contextual behavior can be introduced into a noncontextual target under the stated definition of univalence, the resource ordering is not yet established.
  2. [§4 (classical excess monotone)] Definition of classical excess (minimal embedding error into an infinite classical system): the manuscript must prove that this quantity is non-increasing under the free operations, including under arbitrary univalent simulations; the current sketch does not address how the embedding error transforms when the target GPT is replaced by a simulation of another GPT.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§5] The parity-oblivious multiplexing game success probability is asserted to be a monotone; an explicit proof that it is non-increasing under univalent simulations (rather than only under classical operations) should be supplied or referenced.
  2. [§2] Notation for GPTs and simulations is introduced without a consolidated table of symbols; adding one would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 (resource theory of GPT-contextuality)] The central claim that univalent simulations preserve operational equivalences and therefore cannot generate contextuality (and hence that noncontextual GPTs are least elements) is load-bearing for the entire hierarchy. The abstract asserts this follows from preservation of equivalences, but without an explicit preservation theorem showing that no contextual behavior can be introduced into a noncontextual target under the stated definition of univalence, the resource ordering is not yet established.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit statement of the preservation theorem would strengthen the manuscript. The definition of univalent simulation is designed to preserve operational equivalences, which by the standard definition of contextuality in GPTs (as violation of equivalences) ensures that contextuality cannot be generated. However, to make this rigorous, we will include a dedicated theorem in §3 proving that univalent simulations map noncontextual GPTs to noncontextual GPTs and preserve the resource ordering. This will explicitly show that no new contextual behavior is introduced. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4 (classical excess monotone)] Definition of classical excess (minimal embedding error into an infinite classical system): the manuscript must prove that this quantity is non-increasing under the free operations, including under arbitrary univalent simulations; the current sketch does not address how the embedding error transforms when the target GPT is replaced by a simulation of another GPT.

    Authors: We acknowledge this gap in the proof. The sketch in the manuscript shows monotonicity under classical embeddings but requires extension to univalent simulations. In the revision, we will provide a complete proof that classical excess is a monotone under univalent simulations by showing how an optimal embedding of the original GPT induces an embedding of the simulated GPT with error no larger than the original, leveraging the properties of univalence and the infinite classical system. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via independent operational definitions

full rationale

The paper constructs a resource theory whose free operations (classical systems plus univalent simulations preserving operational equivalences) are defined to forbid contextuality generation by the preservation property itself; this is the standard construction of a resource theory rather than a reduction of any derived claim to its own fitted inputs or self-citations. Monotones such as classical excess (minimal embedding error into infinite classical systems) and parity-oblivious multiplexing success probability are introduced via independent operational quantities, not by fitting to the hierarchy ordering. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's equations to a prior self-citation or by-construction renaming; the hierarchy ordering follows from the free operations without circularity. This is the normal, non-circular outcome for a well-formed resource theory paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the standard GPT framework and the assumption that univalent simulations preserve operational equivalences; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption General probabilistic theories provide the ambient setting for prepare-and-measure scenarios
    The entire construction is carried out inside GPTs; this is invoked from the first sentence of the abstract.
  • domain assumption Univalent simulations between GPTs preserve operational equivalences and cannot generate contextuality
    This is the explicit justification given for why these maps are free operations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5714 in / 1454 out tokens · 47827 ms · 2026-05-24T00:08:11.977280+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Contextuality in anomalous heat flow

    quant-ph 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Anomalous heat flow occurs in quantum prepare-transform-measure protocols only when noncontextuality inequalities are violated, for evolution times in (0, τ_c), with analysis of an existing experiment and extension to...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Generalized noncontextuality

    David Schmid. Generalized noncontextuality. Solstice of Foundations, ETH Zurich , 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3qn3EHWdOg

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    R. W. Spekkens. Contextuality for preparations, transforma tions, and unsharp measurements. Phys. Rev. A , 71:052108, May 2005. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052108

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.71.052108 2005

  3. [3]

    The ontological identity of empirical indiscern ibles: Leibniz’s method- ological principle and its significance in the work of einstein

    Robert Spekkens. The ontological identity of empirical indiscern ibles: Leibniz’s method- ological principle and its significance in the work of einstein. arXiv:1909.04628, 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.04628

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.04628 1909

  4. [4]

    A mathematical framewor k for operational fine tunings

    Lorenzo Catani and Matthew Leifer. A mathematical framewor k for operational fine tunings. Quantum, 7:948, March 2023. doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-16-948

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2023-03-16-948 2023

  5. [5]

    Frame representatio ns of quantum mechanics and the necessity of negativity in quasi-probability representations

    Christopher Ferrie and Joseph Emerson. Frame representatio ns of quantum mechanics and the necessity of negativity in quasi-probability representations. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(35):352001, jul 2008. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/35/3520 01

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/35/3520 2008

  6. [6]

    Spekkens

    Robert W. Spekkens. Negativity and contextuality are equivalen t notions of nonclassicality. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 101:020401, Jul 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.020401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.020401 2008

  7. [7]

    J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics Physique Fizika , 1(3):195–200,

    work page

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195

    work page doi:10.1103/physicsphysiquefizika.1.195

  9. [9]

    Mazurek, Matthew F

    Michael D. Mazurek, Matthew F. Pusey, Ravi Kunjwal, Kevin J. R esch, and Robert W. Spekkens. An experimental test of noncontextuality without unp hysical idealizations. Na- ture Communications, 7(1):ncomms11780, 2016. doi:10.1038/ncomms11780

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms11780 2016

  10. [10]

    Mazurek, Matthew F

    Michael D. Mazurek, Matthew F. Pusey, Kevin J. Resch, and Rob ert W. Spekkens. Experimen- tally bounding deviations from quantum theory in the landscape of ge neralized probabilistic theories. PRX Quantum , 2:020302, Apr 2021. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.020302

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020302 2021

  11. [11]

    Spekkens, D

    Robert W. Spekkens, D. H. Buzacott, A. J. Keehn, Ben Toner , and G. J. Pryde. Preparation Contextuality Powers Parity-Oblivious Multiplexing. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 102(1):010401, 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.010401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.010401 2009

  12. [12]

    Communi- cation games reveal preparation contextuality

    Alley Hameedi, Armin Tavakoli, Breno Marques, and Mohamed Bour ennane. Communi- cation games reveal preparation contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 119:220402, Nov 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.220402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.220402 2017

  13. [13]

    Spekkens

    David Schmid and Robert W. Spekkens. Contextual advantage for state discrimination. Phys. Rev. X , 8:011015, Feb 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011015. 27

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.011015 2018

  14. [14]

    Preparation context uality as an essential fea- ture underlying quantum communication advantage

    Debashis Saha and Anubhav Chaturvedi. Preparation context uality as an essential fea- ture underlying quantum communication advantage. Phys. Rev. A , 100:022108, Aug 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.100.022108

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.100.022108 2019

  15. [15]

    Contextual advantage f or state-dependent cloning

    Matteo Lostaglio and Gabriel Senno. Contextual advantage f or state-dependent cloning. Quan- tum, 4:258, April 2020. doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-27-258

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-27-258 2020

  16. [16]

    Certifying quantum signatures in thermodyn amics and metrology via contextuality of quantum linear response

    Matteo Lostaglio. Certifying quantum signatures in thermodyn amics and metrology via contextuality of quantum linear response. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125:230603, Dec 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.230603

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.230603 2020

  17. [17]

    Contextuality in entang lement-assisted one-shot classical communication

    Shiv Akshar Yadavalli and Ravi Kunjwal. Contextuality in entang lement-assisted one-shot classical communication. Quantum, 6:839, October 2022. doi:10.22331/q-2022-10-13-839

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2022-10-13-839 2022

  18. [18]

    Contextual advantages and certification for maximum-confidenc e discrimination

    Kieran Flatt, Hanwool Lee, Carles Roch I Carceller, Jonatan Bo hr Brask, and Joonwoo Bae. Contextual advantages and certification for maximum-confidenc e discrimination. PRX Quan- tum, 3:030337, Sep 2022. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.030337

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.030337 2022

  19. [19]

    Quantum vs noncontextual semi-device-independent randomness certification

    Carles Roch i Carceller, Kieran Flatt, Hanwool Lee, Joonwoo Ba e, and Jonatan Bohr Brask. Quantum vs noncontextual semi-device-independent randomness certification. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:050501, Jul 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.050501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.050501 2022

  20. [20]

    Spekkens

    Lorenzo Catani, Matthew Leifer, Giovanni Scala, David Schmid, and Robert W. Spekkens. What is nonclassical about uncertainty relations? Phys. Rev. Lett. , 129:240401, Dec 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.240401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.240401 2022

  21. [21]

    Rafael Wagner, Anita Camillini, and Ernesto F. Galvao. Coherenc e and con- textuality in a mach-zehnder interferometer. Quantum, 8:1240, February 2024. doi:10.22331/q-2024-02-05-1240

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2024-02-05-1240 2024

  22. [22]

    Spekkens

    Lorenzo Catani, Matthew Leifer, Giovanni Scala, David Schmid, and Robert W. Spekkens. Aspects of the phenomenology of interference that are genuinely nonclassical. Phys. Rev. A , 108:022207, Aug 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.108.022207

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.108.022207 2023

  23. [24]

    Quantum resource theories

    Eric Chitambar and Gilad Gour. Quantum resource theories. Rev. Mod. Phys., 91:025001, Apr

    work page

  24. [25]

    doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.025001

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.025001

  25. [26]

    Resources of the quantum world

    Gilad Gour. Resources of the quantum world. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05474 , 2024. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.05474

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.05474 2024

  26. [27]

    Horodecki, P

    Ryszard Horodecki, Pawe/suppress l Horodecki, Micha/suppress l Horodecki, and Karol Horodecki. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. , 81:865–942, Jun 2009. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.865 2009

  27. [28]

    Resource theories as quantale modules.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.02349, 2021

    Tom´ aˇ s Gonda. Resource theories as quantale modules.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.02349, 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.02349

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.02349 2021

  28. [29]

    Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms

    Lucien Hardy. Quantum theory from five reasonable axioms. arXiv:quant-ph/0101012, 2001. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0101012. 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0101012 2001

  29. [30]

    Information processing in generalized pro babilistic theories

    Jonathan Barrett. Information processing in generalized pro babilistic theories. Phys. Rev. A , 75:032304, Mar 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032304

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.75.032304 2007

  30. [31]

    Generalized probability the ories: what determines the structure of quantum theory? Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 47(32): 323001, jul 2014

    Peter Janotta and Haye Hinrichsen. Generalized probability the ories: what determines the structure of quantum theory? Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 47(32): 323001, jul 2014. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/32/323001

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/32/323001 2014

  31. [34]

    Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction

    Daniel Gottesman. Stabilizer codes and quantum error correc tion. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology , 1997. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9705052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9705052 1997

  32. [35]

    M¨ uller and Andrew J

    Markus P. M¨ uller and Andrew J. P. Garner. Testing quantum th eory by generalizing noncon- textuality. Phys. Rev. X , 13:041001, Oct 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.041001 2023

  33. [36]

    Simon Kochen and E. P. Specker. The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , pages 293–328. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1975. doi:10.1 007/978-94-010-1795-4 17

    work page 1975

  34. [37]

    Contextual fraction as a measure of contextuality

    Samson Abramsky, Rui Soares Barbosa, and Shane Mansfield. Contextual fraction as a measure of contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:050504, Aug 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.050504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.050504 2017

  35. [38]

    Closing Bell Boxing Black Box Simulations in the Resource Theory of Contextuality , pages 475–529

    Rui Soares Barbosa, Martti Karvonen, and Shane Mansfield. Closing Bell Boxing Black Box Simulations in the Resource Theory of Contextuality , pages 475–529. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24117-8 13

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24117-8 2023

  36. [39]

    Neither contextuality nor nonlocality admits catalysts

    Martti Karvonen. Neither contextuality nor nonlocality admits catalysts. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 127:160402, Oct 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.160402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.160402 2021

  37. [40]

    The sheaf-theo retic structure of non- locality and contextuality

    Samson Abramsky and Adam Brandenburger. The sheaf-theo retic structure of non- locality and contextuality. New Journal of Physics , 13(11):113036, nov 2011. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113036

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113036 2011

  38. [41]

    Memory cost of quantum contextuality

    Matthias Kleinmann, Otfried G¨ uhne, Jos´ e R Portillo, Jan- ˚ Ake Larsson, and Ad´ an Cabello. Memory cost of quantum contextuality. New Journal of Physics , 13(11):113011, nov 2011. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113011

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/11/113011 2011

  39. [42]

    How much contextuality? Natural Computing , 11(2):261–265, 2012

    Karl Svozil. How much contextuality? Natural Computing , 11(2):261–265, 2012. doi:10.1007/s11047-012-9318-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11047-012-9318-9 2012

  40. [43]

    Grudka, K

    A. Grudka, K. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horo decki, P. Joshi, W. K/suppress lobus, and A. W´ ojcik. Quantifying contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 112:120401, Mar 2014. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.120401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.120401 2014

  41. [44]

    Contextual robustness: An o perational measure of contex- tuality

    Lu Li, Kaifeng Bu, and Junde Wu. Contextual robustness: An o perational measure of contex- tuality. Phys. Rev. A , 101:012120, Jan 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.101.012120

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012120 2020

  42. [45]

    The rank of contextuality

    Karol Horodecki, Jingfang Zhou, Maciej Stankiewicz, Roberto Salazar, Pawe/suppress l Horodecki, Robert Raussendorf, Ryszard Horodecki, Ravishankar Ramanat han, and Emily Ty- hurst. The rank of contextuality. New Journal of Physics , 25(7):073003, jul 2023. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acdf78. 29

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acdf78 2023

  43. [46]

    Resource theory of contextuality

    Barbara Amaral. Resource theory of contextuality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sc iences, 377(2157):20190010, 2019. doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0010

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2019.0010 2019

  44. [47]

    Resource theory of co ntextuality for arbitrary prepare-and-measure experiments

    Cristhiano Duarte and Barbara Amaral. Resource theory of co ntextuality for arbitrary prepare-and-measure experiments. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 59(6):062202, 06 2018. doi:10.1063/1.5018582

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5018582 2018

  45. [48]

    Spekkens, and Elie Wolfe

    David Schmid, Robert W. Spekkens, and Elie Wolfe. All the noncon textuality inequalities for arbitrary prepare-and-measure experiments with respect t o any fixed set of operational equivalences. Phys. Rev. A , 97:062103, Jun 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062103

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.062103 2018

  46. [49]

    Using a resource theoretic perspective to witness and engineer quantum generalize d contextuality for prepare- and-measure scenarios

    Rafael Wagner, Roberto D Baldij˜ ao, Alisson Tezzin, and B´ arb ara Amaral. Using a resource theoretic perspective to witness and engineer quantum generalize d contextuality for prepare- and-measure scenarios. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 56(50):505303, nov 2023. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad0bcc

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ad0bcc 2023

  47. [50]

    Selby, Elie Wolfe, Ravi Kunjwal, and Robert W

    David Schmid, John H. Selby, Elie Wolfe, Ravi Kunjwal, and Robert W. Spekkens. Char- acterization of noncontextuality in the framework of generalized p robabilistic theories. PRX Quantum, 2:010331, Feb 2021. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010331

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010331 2021

  48. [51]

    Victor Gitton and Mischa P. Woods. Solvable Criterion for the Con textuality of any Prepare- and-Measure Scenario. Quantum, 6:732, June 2022. doi:10.22331/q-2022-06-07-732

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2022-06-07-732 2022

  49. [52]

    Victor Gitton and Mischa P. Woods. On the system loophole of gen eralized noncontextuality. arXiv:2209.04469, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.04469

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.04469 2022

  50. [53]

    Contextuality of general probabilistic theor ies

    Farid Shahandeh. Contextuality of general probabilistic theor ies. PRX Quantum , 2:010330, Feb 2021. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010330

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010330 2021

  51. [54]

    Selby, David Schmid, Elie Wolfe, Ana Bel´ en Sainz, Ravi Ku njwal, and Robert W

    John H. Selby, David Schmid, Elie Wolfe, Ana Bel´ en Sainz, Ravi Ku njwal, and Robert W. Spekkens. Accessible fragments of generalized probabilistic theor ies, cone equivalence, and applications to witnessing nonclassicality. Phys. Rev. A , 107:062203, Jun 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062203

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.062203 2023

  52. [55]

    Selby, Elie Wolfe, David Schmid, Ana Bel´ en Sainz, and Vinic ius P

    John H. Selby, Elie Wolfe, David Schmid, Ana Bel´ en Sainz, and Vinic ius P. Rossi. Linear program for testing nonclassicality and an open-source implementa tion. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 132: 050202, Jan 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.050202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.050202 2024

  53. [56]

    Spekkens

    Nicholas Harrigan and Robert W. Spekkens. Einstein, Incomplet eness, and the Epistemic View of Quantum States. Foundations of Physics , 40(2):125–157, 2010. doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0 2010

  54. [57]

    Brian Davies and John T

    E. Brian Davies and John T. Lewis. An operational approach to q uantum probability. Com- munications in Mathematical Physics , 17(3):239–260, 1970

    work page 1970

  55. [58]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985

    G¨ unther Ludwig.An Axiomatic Basis for Quantum Mechanics: Volume 1 Derivati on of Hilbert Space Structure. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1985. OCLC: 858930 098

    work page 1985

  56. [59]

    Non-classical correlations in quantum mechanics and beyond

    Ludovico Lami. Non-classical correlations in quantum mechanics and beyond. arXiv:1803.02902, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.02902. 30

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.02902 2018

  57. [60]

    Incompatibility of effec ts in general probabilistic mod- els

    Roberto Beneduci and Leon Loveridge. Incompatibility of effec ts in general probabilistic mod- els. 55(25):254005, may 2022. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac6f9d

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ac6f9d 2022

  58. [61]

    General probabilistic theories: An introduction

    Martin Pl´ avala. General probabilistic theories: An introduction . Physics Reports, 1033:1–64,

    work page

  59. [62]

    Genera l probabilistic theories: An introduction

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.09.001. Genera l probabilistic theories: An introduction

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.09.001 2023

  60. [63]

    Aleksandr S. Holevo. Probabilistic and statistical aspects of quantum theory . Number 1 in Quaderni Monographs. Edizioni della normale, Pisa, 2., english ed edit ion, 2011. OCLC: 746305136

    work page 2011

  61. [64]

    A classical extension of quantu m mechan- ics

    E G Beltrametti and S Bugajski. A classical extension of quantu m mechan- ics. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General , 28(12):3329, jun 1995. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/28/12/007

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/28/12/007 1995

  62. [65]

    Spekkens

    Bob Coecke, Tobias Fritz, and Robert W. Spekkens. A mathema tical theory of resources. Information and Computation , 250:59–86, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2016.02.008. Quantum Physics and Logic

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ic.2016.02.008 2016

  63. [66]

    A mathematical framewor k for causally struc- tured dilations and its relation to quantum self-testing

    Nicholas Gauguin Houghton-Larsen. A mathematical framewor k for causally struc- tured dilations and its relation to quantum self-testing. arXiv:2103.02302, 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.02302

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.02302 2021

  64. [67]

    Classic al theories with entangle- ment

    Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano, Marco Erba, and Paolo Perinotti. Classic al theories with entangle- ment. Phys. Rev. A , 101:042118, Apr 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.101.042118

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.042118 2020

  65. [68]

    Resource convertibility and ordered commutative monoids

    Tobias Fritz. Resource convertibility and ordered commutative monoids. Mathematical Struc- tures in Computer Science , 27(6):850–938, 2017. doi:10.1017/S0960129515000444

    work page doi:10.1017/s0960129515000444 2017

  66. [69]

    Spekkens

    Tom´ aˇ s Gonda and Robert W. Spekkens. Monotones in General Resource Theories. Composi- tionality, 5, August 2023. doi:10.32408/compositionality-5-7

    work page doi:10.32408/compositionality-5-7 2023

  67. [70]

    Spekkens

    Robert W. Spekkens. Evidence for the epistemic view of quantu m states: A toy theory. Phys. Rev. A , 75:032110, Mar 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032110

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.75.032110 2007

  68. [71]

    Limited preparation contextuality in quantum theory and its relation to the cirel’son bound

    Manik Banik, Some Sankar Bhattacharya, Amit Mukherjee, Aru p Roy, Andris Ambainis, and Ashutosh Rai. Limited preparation contextuality in quantum theory and its relation to the cirel’son bound. Phys. Rev. A , 92:030103, Sep 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.030103

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.030103 2015

  69. [72]

    Optimal bounds for parity-oblivious random access codes

    Andr´ e Chailloux, Iordanis Kerenidis, Srijita Kundu, and Jamie Sik ora. Optimal bounds for parity-oblivious random access codes. New Journal of Physics , 18(4):045003, apr 2016. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/4/045003

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/4/045003 2016

  70. [73]

    Shouvik Ghorai and A. K. Pan. Optimal quantum preparation co ntextuality in an n-bit parity-oblivious multiplexing task. Phys. Rev. A , 98:032110, Sep 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032110

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.032110 2018

  71. [74]

    State independent contextual- ity advances one-way communication

    Debashis Saha, Pawe/suppress l Horodecki, and Marcin Paw/suppress lowski. State independent contextual- ity advances one-way communication. New Journal of Physics , 21(9):093057, sep 2019. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab4149. 31

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab4149 2019

  72. [75]

    Parity oblivious d-level random access codes and class of nonco ntextuality inequalities

    Andris Ambainis, Manik Banik, Anubhav Chaturvedi, Dmitry Kravc henko, and Ashutosh Rai. Parity oblivious d-level random access codes and class of nonco ntextuality inequalities. Quantum Information Processing , 18(4):111, 2019. doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2228-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2228-3 2019

  73. [76]

    Armin Tavakoli, Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro, Roope Uola, and Ala stair A. Abbott. Bounding and simulating contextual correlations in quantum theory. PRX Quantum , 2:020334, Jun 2021. doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.020334

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020334 2021

  74. [77]

    Connecting xor and xor ∗ games

    Lorenzo Catani, Ricardo Faleiro, Pierre-Emmanuel Emeriau, Sh ane Mansfield, and Anna Pappa. Connecting xor and xor ∗ games. Phys. Rev. A , 109:012427, Jan 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.012427

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.012427 2024

  75. [78]

    Alterna tive robust ways of wit- nessing nonclassicality in the simplest scenario

    Massy Khoshbin, Lorenzo Catani, and Matthew Leifer. Alterna tive robust ways of wit- nessing nonclassicality in the simplest scenario. Phys. Rev. A , 109:032212, Mar 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.032212

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.032212 2024

  76. [79]

    Signal-locality, uncertainty, and the subquan tum h-theorem

    Antony Valentini. Signal-locality, uncertainty, and the subquan tum h-theorem. i. Physics Letters A , 156(1):5 – 11, 1991. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(91 )90116-P

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91 1991

  77. [80]

    Selby, and Robert W

    David Schmid, John H. Selby, and Robert W. Spekkens. Address ing some com- mon objections to generalized noncontextuality. Phys. Rev. A , 109:022228, Feb 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.022228

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.022228 2024

  78. [81]

    Spekkens

    Robert W. Spekkens. Quasi-Quantization: Classical Statistical Theories with an Epistemic Restriction , pages 83–135. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7303-4 4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7303-4 2016

  79. [82]

    Spekkens’ toy model in all d imensions and its rela- tionship with stabiliser quantum mechanics

    Lorenzo Catani and Dan E Browne. Spekkens’ toy model in all d imensions and its rela- tionship with stabiliser quantum mechanics. New Journal of Physics , 19(7):073035, jul 2017. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa781c

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aa781c 2017

  80. [83]

    Lorenzo Catani and Dan E. Browne. State-injection schemes of quantum computation in spekkens’ toy theory. Phys. Rev. A , 98:052108, Nov 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.052108

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.052108 2018

Showing first 80 references.