Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Large Language Models as Software Components: A Taxonomy for LLM-Integrated Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10300 v1 pith:65WPVSK3 submitted 2024-06-13 cs.SE cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.CLcs.LG
keywords applicationsllm-integratedllmssoftwaresystemstaxonomyapplicationcomponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become widely adopted recently. Research explores their use both as autonomous agents and as tools for software engineering. LLM-integrated applications, on the other hand, are software systems that leverage an LLM to perform tasks that would otherwise be impossible or require significant coding effort. While LLM-integrated application engineering is emerging as new discipline, its terminology, concepts and methods need to be established. This study provides a taxonomy for LLM-integrated applications, offering a framework for analyzing and describing these systems. It also demonstrates various ways to utilize LLMs in applications, as well as options for implementing such integrations. Following established methods, we analyze a sample of recent LLM-integrated applications to identify relevant dimensions. We evaluate the taxonomy by applying it to additional cases. This review shows that applications integrate LLMs in numerous ways for various purposes. Frequently, they comprise multiple LLM integrations, which we term ``LLM components''. To gain a clear understanding of an application's architecture, we examine each LLM component separately. We identify thirteen dimensions along which to characterize an LLM component, including the LLM skills leveraged, the format of the output, and more. LLM-integrated applications are described as combinations of their LLM components. We suggest a concise representation using feature vectors for visualization. The taxonomy is effective for describing LLM-integrated applications. It can contribute to theory building in the nascent field of LLM-integrated application engineering and aid in developing such systems. Researchers and practitioners explore numerous creative ways to leverage LLMs in applications. Though challenges persist, integrating LLMs may revolutionize the way software systems are built.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Improving Public Service Chatbot Design and Civic Impact: Investigation of Citizens' Perceptions of a Metro City 311 Chatbot

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A qualitative case study of Atlanta's 311 chatbot finds that its task-focused design creates interpretation, transparency, and social-context gaps, and suggests community-oriented features to increase civic engagement.

  2. Mind the Gap! Choice Independence in Using Multilingual LLMs for Persuasive Co-Writing Tasks in Different Languages

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Users who first used a Spanish AI writing assistant subsequently used the English AI writing assistant less, suggesting a spillover that violates choice independence.

  3. A Conceptual Framework for Requirements Engineering of Pretrained-Model-Enabled Systems

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A conceptual framework reorganizes requirements engineering for pretrained-model-enabled systems into six activities, based on identified challenges of opaque capabilities, context sensitivity, and continuous evolution.

  4. Enhancing Factual Accuracy and Citation Generation in LLMs via Multi-Stage Self-Verification

    cs.CL 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a four-stage self-verification prompting method but explicitly labels its experimental results as fabricated, so it cannot support its claimed gains.

Pith tools