REVIEW 4 cited by
Threat Modelling and Risk Analysis for Large Language Model (LLM)-Powered Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized various applications by providing advanced natural language processing capabilities. However, this innovation introduces new cybersecurity challenges. This paper explores the threat modeling and risk analysis specifically tailored for LLM-powered applications. Focusing on potential attacks like data poisoning, prompt injection, SQL injection, jailbreaking, and compositional injection, we assess their impact on security and propose mitigation strategies. We introduce a framework combining STRIDE and DREAD methodologies for proactive threat identification and risk assessment. Furthermore, we examine the feasibility of an end-to-end threat model through a case study of a custom-built LLM-powered application. This model follows Shostack's Four Question Framework, adjusted for the unique threats LLMs present. Our goal is to propose measures that enhance the security of these powerful AI tools, thwarting attacks, and ensuring the reliability and integrity of LLM-integrated systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
LLM in the Middle: A Systematic Review of Threats and Mitigations to Real-World LLM-based Systems
A systematic review that categorizes LLM threats, severity scores, and mitigations across development and operation life cycles and multiple deployment scenarios.
-
How Well Do AI Systems Solve AP Physics? A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models on Algebra-Based Free Response Questions
ChatGPT 4.1 mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Claude 4.0 Sonnet, and DeepSeek R1 average 82–92% on AP Physics 1/2 free-response questions but systematically fail spatial, visual, and conceptual tasks.
-
A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models
A taxonomy of model extraction attacks and defenses for large language models, with proposed evaluation metrics and future research directions.
-
Securing Agentic AI: Threat Modeling and Risk Analysis for Network Monitoring Agentic AI System
An LLM network-monitoring agent experienced nearly doubled telemetry delays under replayed DoS traffic, and edited memory files led it to choose longer, heavier packet captures, in a two-case test of the MAESTRO threa...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.