Pith. sign in

REVIEW 19 cited by

CodeGemma: Open Code Models Based on Gemma

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11409 v2 pith:KACLCFGE submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords codecodegemmamodelsopengemmagenerationlanguagemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces CodeGemma, a collection of specialized open code models built on top of Gemma, capable of a variety of code and natural language generation tasks. We release three model variants. CodeGemma 7B pretrained (PT) and instruction-tuned (IT) variants have remarkably resilient natural language understanding, excel in mathematical reasoning, and match code capabilities of other open models. CodeGemma 2B is a state-of-the-art code completion model designed for fast code infilling and open-ended generation in latency-sensitive settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Incentivizing Vision Language Models to Search for Long Video Question Answering

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    RL post-training of a VLM agent with neuro-symbolic temporal-logic rewards for evidence retrieval raises Pass@1 by up to 8% and Pass@4 by 15% on long-video QA.

  2. CrossPL: Evaluating Large Language Models on Cross Programming Language Code Generation

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    CrossPL, a 1,982-task benchmark built from GitHub repositories, shows that LLMs achieve at most 79.74% pass@1 on cross-language IPC code generation and struggle with low-level protocols like Pipe.

  3. Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Code via Approximated Task Conditioning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ATC detects AI-generated code by asking a language model to reconstruct the programming task, then scoring token entropy under that reconstructed task, outperforming prior zero-shot detectors on Python, C++, and Java ...

  4. Structure-Aware Fill-in-the-Middle Pretraining for Code

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    AST-FIM masks complete syntax-tree subtrees during fill-in-the-middle pretraining, improving infilling performance on real-world code edits.

  5. Doc2CI: A Multi-Service Study of CI Configuration Generation Using Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across four CI services and 16 LLMs, exact reproduction of reference configs stays below 3.2%, while schema validity (about 71%) trails parse rate (97%), showing similarity and usability are different objectives.

  6. Towards Reliable C-to-Rust Translation with Rule-Guided Reasoning and Reinforcement Learning

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A rule-guided MCTS plus dual-reward reinforcement learning pipeline improves LLM-based C-to-Rust translation accuracy and cuts unsafe Rust output across three benchmarks.

  7. Functional and Secure Code Generation with Task Vectors

    cs.SE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    LPO-derived Secure-Anchored task vectors raise simultaneous functional-and-secure code rates by 2.1–36 pp on six coding LLMs with near-zero inference overhead.

  8. Prompt Orchestration Markup Language

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    POML is a markup language that structures LLM prompts, embeds multimodal data, and decouples formatting via stylesheets, with case studies showing strong prompt format sensitivity.

  9. AutoBridge: Automating Smart Device Integration with Centralized Platform

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AutoBridge generates platform-compliant IoT integration code with 93.87% success and 94.87% function coverage in fully automatic mode, reaching 100% coverage with minimal yes/no human feedback.

  10. Can LLMs Write CI? A Study on Automatic Generation of GitHub Actions Configurations

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across six LLMs, zero-shot generation of GitHub Actions YAML configurations reaches 69% similarity to ground truth but only 3% exact matches, with code-pretrained models performing no better than general-purpose ones.

  11. Zero-Shot Attribution for Large Language Models: A Distribution Testing Approach

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Anubis re-frames LLM attribution as a distribution testing problem with EVAL access, and reports AUROC above 0.9 on code benchmarks with around 2000 samples, beating detectGPT.

  12. RedCoder: Automated Multi-Turn Red Teaming for Code LLMs

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-turn red-teaming agent trained on simulated attacker-defender conversations induces vulnerable code at higher rates than prior attack methods across several code LLMs.

  13. SV-TrustEval-C: Evaluating Structure and Semantic Reasoning in Large Language Models for Source Code Vulnerability Analysis

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Large language models perform poorly on a new C-code vulnerability benchmark, indicating they rely on pattern matching rather than genuine reasoning.

  14. A Qualitative Investigation into LLM-Generated Multilingual Code Comments and Automatic Evaluation Metrics

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Neural metrics for evaluating code comments are unreliable for multilingual output, often scoring random noise as high as real generated comments.

  15. CLOVER: A Test Case Generation Benchmark with Coverage, Long-Context, and Verification

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLOVER is a new Python unit-test-generation benchmark with 845 problems, contexts up to 128k tokens, and coverage-based retrieval, where all 14 evaluated models score below 35% on the hardest task.

  16. Position: Intelligent Coding Systems Should Write Programs with Justifications

    cs.SE 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper advocating that intelligent coding systems should accompany code with justified explanations that are cognitively aligned and semantically faithful.

  17. Efficient Code LLM Training via Distribution-Consistent and Diversity-Aware Data Selection

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Selecting 10K code instructions with a parametric feature-space model lifts DeepSeekCoder-Base-6.7B from 67.1% to 69.5% on HumanEval and from 74.9% to 77.2% on MBPP versus full 92K training, in single-run evaluations.

  18. GeoPandas-AI: A Smart Class Bringing LLM as Stateful AI Code Assistant

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new open-source Python class, GeoDataFrameAI, adds a stateful LLM chat interface directly to GeoPandas data frames for geospatial code generation and analysis.

  19. Reinforcing Code Generation: Improving Text-to-SQL with Execution-Based Learning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Execution-based reinforcement learning raises SQLCoder-7B's exact-match accuracy from 31.49% to 49.83% on TEMPTABQA-C, approaching SQLCoder-70B, but shows no gain for CodeGemma.

Pith tools