Pith. sign in

REVIEW 12 cited by

A Survey of Large Language Models for Financial Applications: Progress, Prospects and Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11903 v1 pith:NMV25SAK submitted 2024-06-15 q-fin.GN cs.AIq-fin.CP

classification q-fin.GNcs.AIq-fin.CP
keywords financialapplicationsllmsanalysisapplicationmodelssurveycapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have unlocked novel opportunities for machine learning applications in the financial domain. These models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding context, processing vast amounts of data, and generating human-preferred contents. In this survey, we explore the application of LLMs on various financial tasks, focusing on their potential to transform traditional practices and drive innovation. We provide a discussion of the progress and advantages of LLMs in financial contexts, analyzing their advanced technologies as well as prospective capabilities in contextual understanding, transfer learning flexibility, complex emotion detection, etc. We then highlight this survey for categorizing the existing literature into key application areas, including linguistic tasks, sentiment analysis, financial time series, financial reasoning, agent-based modeling, and other applications. For each application area, we delve into specific methodologies, such as textual analysis, knowledge-based analysis, forecasting, data augmentation, planning, decision support, and simulations. Furthermore, a comprehensive collection of datasets, model assets, and useful codes associated with mainstream applications are presented as resources for the researchers and practitioners. Finally, we outline the challenges and opportunities for future research, particularly emphasizing a number of distinctive aspects in this field. We hope our work can help facilitate the adoption and further development of LLMs in the financial sector.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 12 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 29 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. From Information to Delegation: Mapping Human-AI Financial Decision Making

    cs.HC 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 1.5 million ChatGPT and Gemini chats in the US and India, consumers use AI overwhelmingly to inform and shape financial decisions, while delegation of financial execution remains rare.

  2. Confidently Wrong: Detecting Hallucinations in Financial Question Answering from LLM Internal States

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Among 8/8 self-consistent answers on FinQA, residual-stream probes detect wrong answers at 0.68–0.77 AUROC versus 0.55–0.63 for the best cheap output baselines across three 8–9B models.

  3. LLM-Enhanced Dynamic Financial Knowledge Graphs for Cross-Entity Signal Propagation and alpha discovery

    stat.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In controlled simulations, community-aware propagation of LLM event signals on dynamic financial knowledge graphs recovers latent communities and prices incrementally beyond direct signals, though live alpha remains untested.

  4. Consistent but Miscalibrated: Evaluating LLM Limitations for Risk Communication in Natural Language

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Current LLMs produce consistent but miscalibrated natural-language descriptors of likelihood and uncertainty from probabilistic predictions and are not yet reliable zero-shot risk communicators.

  5. THEME: Enhancing Thematic Investing with Semantic Stock Representations and Temporal Dynamics

    q-fin.PM 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical contrastive learning framework that aligns stocks with theme descriptions and refines embeddings with short-term return signals improves thematic retrieval and backtested portfolio metrics.

  6. To Trade or Not to Trade: An Agentic Approach to Estimating Market Risk Improves Trading Decisions

    q-fin.ST 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-discovered stochastic models of price paths provide risk metrics that improve trader-agent decisions, raising average Sharpe ratios from 0.88 to 1.40 in the paper's backtests.

  7. AI Analyst: Framework and Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models for Financial Time Series Report Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs such as GPT-4o can generate coherent financial reports from time series data, and a proposed highlighting system categorizes report segments by whether they stem from data, reasoning, or external knowledge.

  8. MetaGraph: A Large-Scale Meta-Analysis of GenAI in Financial NLP (2022-2025)

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using LLM extraction on 681 papers, the authors build a public knowledge graph showing financial NLP moved from LLM adoption to limitation-aware, modular system design between 2022 and 2025.

  9. Governing Generative AI Across Financial Institutions: A Framework for Generative AI Risk Control

    q-fin.RM 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    GAICF maps SR 26-2 model-risk principles into approved-use gates, risk tiers, evidence checks, and output monitoring for generative AI outside the formal model boundary.

  10. Large Language Models for Next-Generation Wireless Network Management: A Survey and Tutorial

    cs.NI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey and tutorial that organizes LLM-enabled wireless network optimization into formulation, solution, and verification stages, with case studies drawn from the authors' own prior papers.

  11. MoFE-Time: Mixture of Frequency Domain Experts for Time-Series Forecasting Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MoFE-Time reports average MSE 0.2755 and MAE 0.3226 across six public benchmarks, about 7% lower than Time-MoE, by adding frequency-domain experts to a Mixture of Experts transformer.

  12. Using Large Language Models to Suggest Informative Prior Distributions in Bayesian Statistics

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLMs suggested directionally correct but poorly calibrated Bayesian priors, with Claude's weak priors ranking best on KL divergence from the data.

Pith tools