Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Navigating Knowledge Management Implementation Success in Government Organizations: A type-2 fuzzy approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12345 v1 pith:VNTJ2YAA submitted 2024-06-18 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords knowledgemanagementorganizationssuccessgovernmentstaffcriticalfactors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Optimal information and knowledge management is crucial for organizations to achieve their objectives efficiently. As a rare and valuable resource, effective knowledge management provides a strategic advantage and has become a key determinant of organizational success. The study aims to identify critical success and failure factors for implementing knowledge management systems in government organizations. This research employs a descriptive survey methodology, collecting data through random interviews and questionnaires. The study highlights the critical success factors for knowledge management systems in government organizations, including cooperation, an open atmosphere, staff training, creativity and innovation, removal of organizational constraints, reward policies, role modeling, and focus. Conversely, failure to consider formality, staff participation, collaboration technologies, network and hardware infrastructure, complexity, IT staff, and trust can pose significant obstacles to successful implementation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Schemora: schema matching via multi-stage recommendation and metadata enrichment using off-the-shelf llms

    cs.DB 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    SCHEMORA combines LLM-based metadata enrichment with hybrid vector and lexical retrieval to achieve new state-of-the-art schema matching accuracy on MIMIC-OMOP, improving HitRate@5 by 7.49 percentage points over prior best.

  2. Variational-Ising-Attention (VIA):TailoredAttentionMattersfor Science

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Variational-Ising-Attention with backbone-deployed low-rank couplings substantially beats softmax on USPTO-50k reaction-center exact-match, especially for multi-center cases.

  3. Approximate Energy-Integration Method for Identifying Collisional Neutrino Flavor Instabilities

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sector-wise energy-integration approximation (method C) robustly reduces multi-energy collisional neutrino flavor dispersion relations while matching exact growth rates and frequencies across isotropic, anisotropic,...

  4. Kandinsky 5.0: A Family of Foundation Models for Image and Video Generation

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Kandinsky 5.0 is a released family of image and video generation models (up to 19B parameters) that uses flow matching, a CrossDiT architecture, sparse attention, and multi-stage training to produce high-quality 10-se...

  5. CTA-Flux: Integrating Chinese Cultural Semantics into High-Quality English Text-to-Image Communities

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper claims a Chinese-prompt adapter for the Flux text-to-image model, but the manuscript body is an unrelated LLM self-recognition paper, leaving the claim unsupported.

  6. Signal or Noise? Evaluating Large Language Models in Resume Screening Across Contextual Variations and Human Expert Benchmarks

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    LLMs score resumes higher than human experts and differ in how they adapt to company context, but the study's statistical claims are undermined by non-independent observations, a tiny human sample, and no released data.

Pith tools