REVIEW 4 cited by
Reconciling Kaplan and Chinchilla Scaling Laws
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Kaplan et al. [2020] (`Kaplan') and Hoffmann et al. [2022] (`Chinchilla') studied the scaling behavior of transformers trained on next-token language prediction. These studies produced different estimates for how the number of parameters ($N$) and training tokens ($D$) should be set to achieve the lowest possible loss for a given compute budget ($C$). Kaplan: $N_\text{optimal} \propto C^{0.73}$, Chinchilla: $N_\text{optimal} \propto C^{0.50}$. This paper finds that much of this discrepancy can be attributed to Kaplan counting non-embedding rather than total parameters, combined with their analysis being performed at small scale. Simulating the Chinchilla study under these conditions produces biased scaling coefficients close to Kaplan's. Hence, this paper reaffirms Chinchilla's scaling coefficients, by explaining the primary cause of Kaplan's original overestimation. As a second contribution, the paper explains differences in the reported relationships between loss and compute. These findings lead us to recommend that future scaling studies use total parameters and compute.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
How Much Is a Dataset Worth? Scaling Laws, the Vendi Score, and Matrix Spectral Functions
Vendi Score and scaling-law objectives belong to the class of matrix spectral functions, which are submodular, enabling efficient greedy selection of training data that outperforms random subsets in predicting held-ou...
-
Scaling Collapse Reveals Universal Dynamics in Compute-Optimally Trained Neural Networks
Compute-optimally trained networks of different sizes show loss curves that collapse onto one universal curve after normalization; with learning rate decay, the collapse is tighter than seed-to-seed noise, providing a...
-
From Zipf's Law to Neural Scaling through Heaps' Law and Hilberg's Hypothesis
Zipf's law, via differential Heaps and Hilberg laws, forces a power-law lower bound on the excess cross entropy of any entropy-bounded foundation model.
-
Meek Models Shall Inherit the Earth
Under fixed-distribution neural scaling laws, the capability gap between state-of-the-art and low-compute AI models shrinks over time toward zero.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.