REVIEW 3 cited by
MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues, which can manifest as misreading and misrecognition errors due to the complexity of multimodal knowledge. Previous benchmarks have not systematically analyzed the performance of editing methods in correcting these two error types. To better represent and correct these errors, we decompose multimodal knowledge into its visual and textual components. Different error types correspond to different editing formats, which edit distinct parts of the multimodal knowledge. We present MC-MKE, a fine-grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing benchmark emphasizing Modality Consistency. Our benchmark facilitates independent correction of misreading and misrecognition errors by editing the corresponding knowledge component. We evaluate four multimodal knowledge editing methods on MC-MKE, revealing their limitations, particularly in terms of modality consistency. Our work highlights the challenges posed by multimodal knowledge editing and motivates further research in developing effective techniques for this task.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Towards Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Editing for Multimodal LLMs
CogEdit and MIND shift multimodal knowledge editing toward evaluating and enabling meta-cognitive skills: self-awareness, boundary monitoring, and noise robustness.
-
Are Any-to-Any Models More Consistent Across Modality Transfers Than Specialists?
On the ACON benchmark, any-to-any models do not consistently beat specialist model pairs on cyclic consistency, but show weak latent-space consistency in equivariance tests.
-
Lifting Data-Tracing Machine Unlearning to Knowledge-Tracing for Foundation Models
A position paper urging a shift from data-tracing to knowledge-tracing machine unlearning for foundation models, supported by a CLIP case study that shows current methods struggle to generalize.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.