Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MC-MKE: A Fine-Grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing Benchmark Emphasizing Modality Consistency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13219 v2 pith:UEM7MCZ7 submitted 2024-06-19 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords knowledgemultimodaleditingbenchmarkconsistencyerrorsmc-mkemodality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are prone to non-factual or outdated knowledge issues, which can manifest as misreading and misrecognition errors due to the complexity of multimodal knowledge. Previous benchmarks have not systematically analyzed the performance of editing methods in correcting these two error types. To better represent and correct these errors, we decompose multimodal knowledge into its visual and textual components. Different error types correspond to different editing formats, which edit distinct parts of the multimodal knowledge. We present MC-MKE, a fine-grained Multimodal Knowledge Editing benchmark emphasizing Modality Consistency. Our benchmark facilitates independent correction of misreading and misrecognition errors by editing the corresponding knowledge component. We evaluate four multimodal knowledge editing methods on MC-MKE, revealing their limitations, particularly in terms of modality consistency. Our work highlights the challenges posed by multimodal knowledge editing and motivates further research in developing effective techniques for this task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Meta-Cognitive Knowledge Editing for Multimodal LLMs

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CogEdit and MIND shift multimodal knowledge editing toward evaluating and enabling meta-cognitive skills: self-awareness, boundary monitoring, and noise robustness.

  2. Are Any-to-Any Models More Consistent Across Modality Transfers Than Specialists?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On the ACON benchmark, any-to-any models do not consistently beat specialist model pairs on cyclic consistency, but show weak latent-space consistency in equivariance tests.

  3. Lifting Data-Tracing Machine Unlearning to Knowledge-Tracing for Foundation Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper urging a shift from data-tracing to knowledge-tracing machine unlearning for foundation models, supported by a CLIP case study that shows current methods struggle to generalize.

Pith tools