Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

BeHonest: Benchmarking Honesty in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13261 v3 pith:65FGBF77 submitted 2024-06-19 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords honestyllmsmodelsbehonestalignmentbenchmarkdesignedevaluate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Previous works on Large Language Models (LLMs) have mainly focused on evaluating their helpfulness or harmlessness. However, honesty, another crucial alignment criterion, has received relatively less attention. Dishonest behaviors in LLMs, such as spreading misinformation and defrauding users, present severe risks that intensify as these models approach superintelligent levels. Enhancing honesty in LLMs addresses critical limitations and helps uncover latent capabilities that are not readily expressed. This underscores the urgent need for reliable methods and benchmarks to effectively ensure and evaluate the honesty of LLMs. In this paper, we introduce BeHonest, a pioneering benchmark specifically designed to assess honesty in LLMs comprehensively. BeHonest evaluates three essential aspects of honesty: awareness of knowledge boundaries, avoidance of deceit, and consistency in responses. Building on this foundation, we designed 10 scenarios to evaluate and analyze 9 popular LLMs on the market, including both closed-source and open-source models from different model families with varied model sizes. Our findings indicate that there is still significant room for improvement in the honesty of LLMs. We encourage the AI community to prioritize honesty alignment in these models, which can harness their full potential to benefit society while preventing them from causing harm through deception or inconsistency. Our benchmark and code can be found at: \url{https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/BeHonest}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM-based Question-Answer Framework for Sensor-driven HVAC System Interaction

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JARVIS, an LLM-based HVAC question-answering framework with an Expert-LLM, a parameterized SQL builder, and bottom-up planning, outperforms a text-to-SQL baseline and its own ablations on a small expert-curated dataset.

  2. MTCMB: A Multi-Task Benchmark Framework for Evaluating LLMs on Knowledge, Reasoning, and Safety in Traditional Chinese Medicine

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MTCMB is a 12-dataset benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Traditional Chinese Medicine knowledge, reasoning, and safety, with results showing models still fail at clinical reasoning and safe prescriptions.

  3. Exploring Consciousness in LLMs: A Systematic Survey of Theories, Implementations, and Frontier Risks

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    This survey organizes research on LLM consciousness, separating consciousness from awareness and cataloging theoretical tools, empirical proxies, risks, and open challenges.

  4. Alignment and Safety in Large Language Models: Safety Mechanisms, Training Paradigms, and Emerging Challenges

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 1.0 of 10

    A broad survey of LLM alignment that catalogs objectives, benchmarks, SFT/RLHF/DPO methods, and safety challenges, without contributing new experimental or theoretical results.

Pith tools