Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Knowledge Tagging System on Math Questions via LLMs with Flexible Demonstration Retriever

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.13885 v1 pith:UK3YDWSP submitted 2024-06-19 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords knowledgellmstaggingdemonstrationquestionquestionsstrongdefinitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge tagging for questions plays a crucial role in contemporary intelligent educational applications, including learning progress diagnosis, practice question recommendations, and course content organization. Traditionally, these annotations are always conducted by pedagogical experts, as the task requires not only a strong semantic understanding of both question stems and knowledge definitions but also deep insights into connecting question-solving logic with corresponding knowledge concepts. With the recent emergence of advanced text encoding algorithms, such as pre-trained language models, many researchers have developed automatic knowledge tagging systems based on calculating the semantic similarity between the knowledge and question embeddings. In this paper, we explore automating the task using Large Language Models (LLMs), in response to the inability of prior encoding-based methods to deal with the hard cases which involve strong domain knowledge and complicated concept definitions. By showing the strong performance of zero- and few-shot results over math questions knowledge tagging tasks, we demonstrate LLMs' great potential in conquering the challenges faced by prior methods. Furthermore, by proposing a reinforcement learning-based demonstration retriever, we successfully exploit the great potential of different-sized LLMs in achieving better performance results while keeping the in-context demonstration usage efficiency high.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring LLMs for Predicting Tutor Strategy and Student Outcomes in Dialogues

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLMs reach only 49% F1 (MathDial) and 27% F1 (AlgebraNation) when predicting the next tutor move, while tutor moves help predict dialogue success in AlgebraNation but not consistently on MathDial.

  2. A LLM-Driven Multi-Agent Systems for Professional Development of Mathematics Teachers

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper introduces I-VIP, a multi-agent LLM platform for mathematics teacher PD, reporting 97.49% positive response feedback in a five-user study.

Pith tools