Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

How Data Inter-connectivity Shapes LLMs Unlearning: A Structural Unlearning Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.16810 v2 pith:DFVJGKTW submitted 2024-06-24 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords dataunlearninginter-connectivityllmspistolstructuraldatasetsdifficulty
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While unlearning knowledge from large language models (LLMs) is receiving increasing attention, one important aspect remains unexplored. Existing approaches and benchmarks assume data points to-be-forgotten are independent, ignoring their inter-connectivity - a fundamental characteristic of real-world data structures. In this paper, we propose PISTOL, a method for compiling structural datasets. PISTOL leverages the inherently structured nature of contractual relationships, offering several key benefits. First, it enables insights into the impact of structural data on unlearning effectiveness. Second, it provides precise and concise ground truths for clearer evaluation. Third, its attribute generation does not require input from pre-trained LLMs, mitigating confounding risks. Leveraging datasets synthesized using PISTOL, we demonstrate how data inter-connectivity impacts LLM unlearning. Specifically, (a) in both the pre-trained and fine-tuned models, unlearning difficulty increases as data inter-connectivity grows, (b) there is a positive correlation between the density of the knowledge graph and unlearning difficulty, and (c) when the to-be-forgotten data is skewed towards one domain, balancing retaining performance across all domains is challenging.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Standard vs. Modular Sampling: Best Practices for Reliable LLM Unlearning

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Entity-aligned sampling (MELU) is stabler than 1:1 or cyclic retain-set sampling for LLM unlearning, but the paper's diverse-neighbor claim is contradicted by its own Balanced results.

  2. Editing as Unlearning: Are Knowledge Editing Methods Strong Baselines for Large Language Model Unlearning?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    WISE and AlphaEdit, two knowledge editing methods, are competitive unlearning baselines when unlearning is framed as editing a model's answer into a refusal.

  3. A Survey on Generative Model Unlearning: Fundamentals, Taxonomy, Evaluation, and Future Direction

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey and framework that categorizes generative model unlearning by point-wise versus concept-wise objectives, parameter-based versus non-parametric methods, and completeness/utility/efficiency evaluation.

  4. Lifting Data-Tracing Machine Unlearning to Knowledge-Tracing for Foundation Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper urging a shift from data-tracing to knowledge-tracing machine unlearning for foundation models, supported by a CLIP case study that shows current methods struggle to generalize.

Pith tools