Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Do LLMs dream of elephants (when told not to)? Latent concept association and associative memory in transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18400 v2 pith:75HV63KM submitted 2024-06-26 cs.CL cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CLcs.LGstat.ML
keywords llmsmemoryassociativefactsassociationconceptcontextslatent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have the capacity to store and recall facts. Through experimentation with open-source models, we observe that this ability to retrieve facts can be easily manipulated by changing contexts, even without altering their factual meanings. These findings highlight that LLMs might behave like an associative memory model where certain tokens in the contexts serve as clues to retrieving facts. We mathematically explore this property by studying how transformers, the building blocks of LLMs, can complete such memory tasks. We study a simple latent concept association problem with a one-layer transformer and we show theoretically and empirically that the transformer gathers information using self-attention and uses the value matrix for associative memory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic Chameleons: Irrelevant Context Hallucinations Reveal Class-Based (Mis)Generalization in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs systematically combine abstract category cues from a query with features from irrelevant context, causing structured answer flips, a behavior the authors call class-based (mis)generalization.

Pith tools