Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Multimodal Data Integration for Precision Oncology: Challenges and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.19611 v1 pith:I2TPQOM6 submitted 2024-06-28 q-bio.QM cs.AI

classification q-bio.QMcs.AI
keywords dataoncologyprecisionintegrationmultimodalcarechallengesclinical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The essence of precision oncology lies in its commitment to tailor targeted treatments and care measures to each patient based on the individual characteristics of the tumor. The inherent heterogeneity of tumors necessitates gathering information from diverse data sources to provide valuable insights from various perspectives, fostering a holistic comprehension of the tumor. Over the past decade, multimodal data integration technology for precision oncology has made significant strides, showcasing remarkable progress in understanding the intricate details within heterogeneous data modalities. These strides have exhibited tremendous potential for improving clinical decision-making and model interpretation, contributing to the advancement of cancer care and treatment. Given the rapid progress that has been achieved, we provide a comprehensive overview of about 300 papers detailing cutting-edge multimodal data integration techniques in precision oncology. In addition, we conclude the primary clinical applications that have reaped significant benefits, including early assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and biomarker discovery. Finally, derived from the findings of this survey, we present an in-depth analysis that explores the pivotal challenges and reveals essential pathways for future research in the field of multimodal data integration for precision oncology.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CIGTSurv: Clinical Information Guided Tri-modal Survival Prediction with Local Prototype Association and Global Feature Alignment

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CIGTSurv uses clinical text embeddings to guide cross-attention and distribution alignment between pathology and genomics, reaching an average C-index of 0.788 across five TCGA cohorts.

  2. No Modality Left Behind: Adapting to Missing Modalities via Knowledge Distillation for Brain Tumor Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AdaMM uses graph-guided adapters, bi-bottleneck distillation, and lesion-presence priors to maintain brain tumor segmentation accuracy when MRI modalities are missing.

  3. Enhancing Personalized Bladder Cancer Treatment Through Reinforcement Learning: A Recurrent Patient State Transition Decision Support Framework

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A DQN trained on random-forest-simulated bladder cancer trajectories reports high internal rewards, but the evaluation is circular and the reported numbers are not supported by the data.

Pith tools