REVIEW 5 cited by
GenderBias-\emph{VL}: Benchmarking Gender Bias in Vision Language Models via Counterfactual Probing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been widely adopted in various applications; however, they exhibit significant gender biases. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate gender bias at the demographic group level, neglecting individual fairness, which emphasizes equal treatment of similar individuals. This research gap limits the detection of discriminatory behaviors, as individual fairness offers a more granular examination of biases that group fairness may overlook. For the first time, this paper introduces the GenderBias-\emph{VL} benchmark to evaluate occupation-related gender bias in LVLMs using counterfactual visual questions under individual fairness criteria. To construct this benchmark, we first utilize text-to-image diffusion models to generate occupation images and their gender counterfactuals. Subsequently, we generate corresponding textual occupation options by identifying stereotyped occupation pairs with high semantic similarity but opposite gender proportions in real-world statistics. This method enables the creation of large-scale visual question counterfactuals to expose biases in LVLMs, applicable in both multimodal and unimodal contexts through modifying gender attributes in specific modalities. Overall, our GenderBias-\emph{VL} benchmark comprises 34,581 visual question counterfactual pairs, covering 177 occupations. Using our benchmark, we extensively evaluate 15 commonly used open-source LVLMs (\eg, LLaVA) and state-of-the-art commercial APIs, including GPT-4o and Gemini-Pro. Our findings reveal widespread gender biases in existing LVLMs. Our benchmark offers: (1) a comprehensive dataset for occupation-related gender bias evaluation; (2) an up-to-date leaderboard on LVLM biases; and (3) a nuanced understanding of the biases presented by these models. \footnote{The dataset and code are available at the \href{https://genderbiasvl.github.io/}{website}.}
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Debiasing CLIP: Interpreting and Correcting Bias in Attention Heads
Using wrong/correct hard-sample head comparisons, LTC finds spurious CLIP attention heads and corrects them to raise worst-group accuracy on biased benchmarks.
-
Evidence Recomposition and Predictive Context Residualization for Visual Attribution in Multimodal Large Language Models
MSEA+ARC, a multi-scale and ranking-based residualization method, claims consistent F1-IoU gains over TAM for token-level MLLM visual attribution.
-
VideoGuard: Protecting Video Content from Unauthorized Editing
VideoGuard adds joint, motion-aware perturbations to videos to block unauthorized diffusion-model editing.
-
Vision-Language Models display a strong gender bias
Using cosine similarity in CLIP embedding space, the paper finds that male and female face sets are differentially associated with occupation and activity statements across all four tested models.
-
Pushing the Limits of Safety: A Technical Report on the ATLAS Challenge 2025
The ATLAS 2025 competition demonstrates that vision-language models remain highly vulnerable to flowchart-based and cross-modal jailbreak attacks, with top scores exceeding 93%.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.