pith. sign in

arxiv: 2407.00660 · v4 · submitted 2024-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Theory of Intrinsic Phonon Thermal Hall Effect in α-RuCl₃

Ramesh Dhakal , David A. S. Kaib , Kate Choi , Sananda Biswas , Roser Valenti , Stephen M. Winter This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 23:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords phonon thermal Hall effectspin-phonon couplingα-RuCl3Berry curvaturethermal Hall conductivityspin-orbit couplingmagnetic field dependence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spin-phonon interactions produce a phonon thermal Hall effect in α-RuCl₃ matching the measured field dependence of κ_xy without a field-induced spin liquid.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies a first-principles method developed for generic spin-phonon couplings in strong spin-orbit coupling materials to α-RuCl₃. It finds that spin-orbit coupling enriches these couplings with chirality that produces finite phonon Berry curvatures. The resulting phonon thermal Hall conductivity qualitatively reproduces the observed field dependence of κ_xy. This supplies an intrinsic phonon mechanism that accounts for the data without invoking a field-induced spin liquid phase.

Core claim

Spin-orbit coupling significantly enriches the form of spin-phonon interactions in α-RuCl₃ and imbues them with chirality conducive to generating finite phonon Berry curvatures, leading to a phonon thermal Hall effect that qualitatively reproduces the measured field dependence of κ_xy without requiring a field-induced spin liquid.

What carries the argument

The first-principles approach for generic spin-phonon couplings that computes chiral interactions and the resulting phonon Berry curvatures under applied magnetic field.

If this is right

  • Thermal Hall conductivity in α-RuCl₃ can be carried by phonons coupled to spins rather than by spin excitations alone.
  • The magnetic field tunes the effect through its influence on the spin-phonon terms.
  • Similar chiral spin-phonon mechanisms may operate in other materials with strong spin-orbit coupling and magnetic ions.
  • The absence of a spin liquid is compatible with the observed thermal Hall data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Thermal Hall measurements in Kitaev-candidate materials may need separate phonon and spin contributions to be disentangled.
  • The same first-principles method could be applied to other layered honeycomb compounds to predict their thermal Hall signals.
  • If the phonon mechanism dominates, the temperature dependence of κ_xy should follow phonon scattering rates rather than spin correlation lengths.

Load-bearing premise

The first-principles calculation accurately captures the strength and chirality of the spin-phonon coupling constants in α-RuCl₃.

What would settle it

A measurement or independent calculation showing that the phonon contribution to κ_xy is much smaller than observed or has the opposite field dependence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2407.00660 by David A. S. Kaib, Kate Choi, Ramesh Dhakal, Roser Valenti, Sananda Biswas, Stephen M. Winter.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Momentum dependence of the computed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Computed acoustic-mode spin-phonon couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Estimated field dependence of longitudinal phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a): Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Estimated field dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Relaxed high-symmetry crystal structure of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Evolution of the real and imaginary parts of the phonon eigenvectors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Momentum angle dependence of the computed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Evolution of different components of the long-wavelength Hall viscosity tensor obtained by fitting computed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a): Comparison of experimental ESR spin excitation energies from Ref. [91, 92] (circles) with results from ED using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Comparison of computed longitudinal phonon thermal conductivity as a function of Lorentzian broadening ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We apply a recently developed first-principles based approach for treating generic spin-phonon couplings in materials with strong spin-orbit coupling to study $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$. Of particular focus is the potential for this material to exhibit a phonon thermal Hall effect induced by spin-phonon interactions. We find that spin-orbit coupling significantly enriches the form of these interactions, and imbues them with chirality that is conducive to generating finite phonon Berry curvatures. We show that this leads to a phonon thermal Hall effect that qualitatively reproduces the measured field dependence of $\kappa_{xy}$ without requiring a field-induced spin liquid.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies a recently developed first-principles approach to generic spin-phonon couplings in strong-SOC materials to α-RuCl₃. It reports that SOC enriches these couplings with chirality, producing phonon Berry curvatures that yield an intrinsic phonon thermal Hall conductivity whose magnetic-field dependence qualitatively matches experimental κ_xy, thereby providing an explanation that does not invoke a field-induced spin liquid.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would be significant for offering a phonon-based mechanism for the observed thermal Hall effect in α-RuCl₃ that competes with spin-liquid interpretations. The parameter-free character of the underlying first-principles spin-phonon method constitutes a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the calculated phonon thermal Hall effect 'qualitatively reproduces the measured field dependence of κ_xy' is presented without quantitative details, error estimates, or explicit comparison to data, which is load-bearing for the central claim.
  2. [Methods/Computational Details] The application of the recently developed first-principles spin-phonon coupling method lacks any reported cross-validation (e.g., against DFPT+SOC or symmetry-constrained effective models) for the chiral interaction channels; an error in the sign or form of these terms would directly invalidate the phonon Berry curvatures and the reported κ_xy field dependence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for recognizing the potential significance of a phonon-based mechanism for the thermal Hall effect in α-RuCl₃. We address each major comment below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional details and checks.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the calculated phonon thermal Hall effect 'qualitatively reproduces the measured field dependence of κ_xy' is presented without quantitative details, error estimates, or explicit comparison to data, which is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the central claim benefits from a more explicit comparison. In the revised manuscript we have added a new figure (Fig. 5) that overlays the calculated κ_xy(B) directly on experimental data from Ref. [Kasahara et al.], together with quantitative metrics (field position of the peak, overall field scale, and sign change). We also report estimated uncertainties arising from k-point sampling and phonon dispersion convergence. These additions make the qualitative agreement more transparent while preserving the abstract wording. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods/Computational Details] The application of the recently developed first-principles spin-phonon coupling method lacks any reported cross-validation (e.g., against DFPT+SOC or symmetry-constrained effective models) for the chiral interaction channels; an error in the sign or form of these terms would directly invalidate the phonon Berry curvatures and the reported κ_xy field dependence.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of additional validation for the chiral channels. The underlying first-principles spin-phonon method was introduced and benchmarked against DFPT and symmetry constraints in our prior work (Ref. [method paper]). For α-RuCl₃ a full DFPT+SOC supercell calculation remains computationally prohibitive. In the revision we have added a dedicated Methods subsection that performs a symmetry analysis of the extracted chiral couplings under the C2/m space group, confirming that all retained terms are symmetry-allowed and that the overall sign pattern is consistent with the perturbative derivation. This provides an independent consistency check on the form of the interactions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies a first-principles method for spin-phonon couplings to compute interactions in α-RuCl₃, then derives phonon Berry curvatures and the resulting thermal Hall conductivity. This constitutes an independent computational prediction from the material Hamiltonian and couplings, with qualitative comparison to experimental field dependence of κ_xy. No equations or steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or unverified self-citations; the central result is externally falsifiable against measured data and does not rely on renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes. The derivation is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The recently developed first-principles approach correctly treats generic spin-phonon couplings in strong-SOC materials.
    Invoked as the foundation for applying the method to α-RuCl₃.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5649 in / 1169 out tokens · 21652 ms · 2026-05-23T23:13:59.824628+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Classification of magnon thermal Hall systems based on U(1) to non-Abelian gauge fields

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Antiferromagnets with multiple magnetic sublattices host non-Abelian SU(N) gauge fields in magnon bands that prevent Berry curvature cancellation and enable a robust magnon thermal Hall response.

  2. Phonon Hall Viscosity and the Intrinsic Thermal Hall Effect of $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Phonon Hall viscosity in α-RuCl₃, measured via acoustic Faraday effect, accounts for a substantial part of the material's intrinsic thermal Hall conductivity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 122 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Kasahara, K

    Y. Kasahara, K. Sugii, T. Ohnishi, M. Shimozawa, M. Yamashita, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Mo- tome, T. Shibauchi, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 217205 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Kasahara, T

    Y. Kasahara, T. Ohnishi, Y. Mizukami, O. Tanaka, S. Ma, K. Sugii, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Mo- tome, et al., Nature 559, 227 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Yokoi, S

    T. Yokoi, S. Ma, Y. Kasahara, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, J. Nasu, Y. Mo- tome, C. Hickey, et al., Science 373, 568 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Imamura, S

    K. Imamura, S. Suetsugu, Y. Mizukami, Y. Yoshida, K. Hashimoto, K. Ohtsuka, Y. Kasahara, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, P. Noh, et al., Sci. Adv.10, eadk3539 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Hentrich, M

    R. Hentrich, M. Roslova, A. Isaeva, T. Doert, W. Brenig, B. B¨ uchner, and C. Hess, Phys. Rev. B99, 085136 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Lefran¸ cois, G

    ´E. Lefran¸ cois, G. Grissonnanche, J. Baglo, P. Lampen- Kelley, J.-Q. Yan, C. Balz, D. Mandrus, S. Nagler, S. Kim, Y.-J. Kim, et al., Phys. Rev. X 12, 021025 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Bruin, R

    J. Bruin, R. Claus, Y. Matsumoto, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, and H. Takagi, Nat. Phys. 18, 401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Kasahara, S

    Y. Kasahara, S. Suetsugu, T. Asaba, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, and Y. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. B 106, L060410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Czajka, T

    P. Czajka, T. Gao, M. Hirschberger, P. Lampen-Kelley, A. Banerjee, N. Quirk, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, and N. P. Ong, Nat. Mater. 22, 36 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Zhang, M

    H. Zhang, M. A. McGuire, A. F. May, H.-Y. Chao, Q. Zheng, M. Chi, B. C. Sales, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, H. Miao, et al., Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 014402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Zhang, Y

    X.-T. Zhang, Y. H. Gao, and G. Chen, Phys. Rep.1070, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Ideue, T

    T. Ideue, T. Kurumaji, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Nat. Mater. 16, 797 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    Zhang, C

    H. Zhang, C. Xu, C. Carnahan, M. Sretenovic, N. Suri, D. Xiao, and X. Ke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 247202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    C. Xu, C. Carnahan, H. Zhang, M. Sretenovic, P. Zhang, D. Xiao, and X. Ke, Phys. Rev. B 107, L060404 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    C. Xu, H. Zhang, C. Carnahan, P. Zhang, D. Xiao, and X. Ke, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094415 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Gillig, X

    M. Gillig, X. Hong, C. Wellm, V. Kataev, W. Yao, Y. Li, B. B¨ uchner, and C. Hess, Phys. Rev. Research5, 043110 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    N. Li, R. Neumann, S. Guang, Q. Huang, J. Liu, K. Xia, X. Yue, Y. Sun, Y. Wang, Q. Li, et al., Phys. Rev. B 108, L140402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Chen, ´E

    L. Chen, ´E. Lefran¸ cois, A. Vallipuram, Q. Barth´ elemy, A. Ataei, W. Yao, Y. Li, and L. Taillefer, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17231 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Guang, N

    S. Guang, N. Li, R. L. Luo, Q. Huang, Y. Wang, X. Yue, K. Xia, Q. Li, X. Zhao, G. Chen, et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 184423 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    X. Zhou, W. Wu, Y. Sui, Y.-f. Yang, and J. Luo, Adv. Funct. Mater. p. 2304921 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    H.-L. Kim, T. Saito, H. Yang, H. Ishizuka, M. J. Coak, J. H. Lee, H. Sim, Y. S. Oh, N. Nagaosa, and J.-G. Park, Nat. Commun. 15, 243 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006)

    A. Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321, 2 (2006)

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  24. [24]

    J. Nasu, J. Yoshitake, and Y. Motome, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 127204 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    McClarty, X.-Y

    P. McClarty, X.-Y. Dong, M. Gohlke, J. Rau, F. Poll- mann, R. Moessner, and K. Penc, Phys. Rev. B 98, 060404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    E. Z. Zhang, L. E. Chern, and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 103, 174402 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    L. E. Chern, E. Z. Zhang, and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 147201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Li and S

    S. Li and S. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. B 106, 024413 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    M. Mori, A. Spencer-Smith, O. P. Sushkov, and 8 S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 265901 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Guo and S

    H. Guo and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 103, 205115 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Sun, J.-Y

    X.-Q. Sun, J.-Y. Chen, and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. B 106, 144111 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    H. Guo, D. G. Joshi, and S. Sachdev, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2215141119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Saito, K

    T. Saito, K. Misaki, H. Ishizuka, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 255901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    Flebus and A

    B. Flebus and A. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 105, L220301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Flebus and A

    B. Flebus and A. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 236301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    K. Sun, Z. Gao, and J.-S. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 103, 214301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 167202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Thingstad, A

    E. Thingstad, A. Kamra, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 107201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Park and B.-J

    S. Park and B.-J. Yang, Phys. Rev. B99, 174435 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Sheikhi, M

    B. Sheikhi, M. Kargarian, and A. Langari, Phys. Rev. B 104, 045139 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Huang and Z

    H. Huang and Z. Tian, Phys. Rev. B 104, 064305 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Bao, Z.-L

    S. Bao, Z.-L. Gu, Y. Shangguan, Z. Huang, J. Liao, X. Zhao, B. Zhang, Z.-Y. Dong, W. Wang, R. Kajimoto, et al., Nat. Commun. 14, 6093 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    D.-Q. To, C. Ameyaw, A. Suresh, S. Bhatt, M. Ku, M. Jungfleisch, J. Xiao, J. Zide, B. Nikoli´ c, and M. Doty, Phys. Rev. B 108, 085435 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    M. Ye, R. M. Fernandes, and N. B. Perkins, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033180 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    M. Ye, L. Savary, and L. Balents, arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.04223 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Mangeolle, L

    L. Mangeolle, L. Balents, and L. Savary, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041031 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Mangeolle, L

    L. Mangeolle, L. Balents, and L. Savary, Phys. Rev. B 106, 245139 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Teng, R. Samajdar, S. Sachdev, and M. S. Scheurer, Phys. Rev. B 104, 035103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Singh, P

    S. Singh, P. P. Stavropoulos, and N. B. Perkins, Physical Review B 110, 094431 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Sheng, D

    L. Sheng, D. Sheng, and C. Ting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 155901 (2006)

    work page 2006

  51. [51]

    Wang and L

    J.-S. Wang and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 80, 012301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    Zhang, J

    L. Zhang, J. Ren, J.-S. Wang, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 225901 (2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    S. Li, H. Yan, and A. H. Nevidomskyy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.07401 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Hentrich, A

    R. Hentrich, A. U. Wolter, X. Zotos, W. Brenig, D. Nowak, A. Isaeva, T. Doert, A. Banerjee, P. Lampen- Kelley, D. G. Mandrus, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 117204 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    S. Gass, P. M. Cˆ onsoli, V. Kocsis, L. T. Corre- dor, P. Lampen-Kelley, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, L. Janssen, M. Vojta, B. B¨ uchner, et al., Phys. Rev. B 101, 245158 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Sch¨ onemann, S

    R. Sch¨ onemann, S. Imajo, F. Weickert, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, Y. Takano, E. L. Brosha, P. F. S. Rosa, S. E. Nagler, K. Kindo, et al., Phys. Rev. B 102, 214432 (2020), ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    H. Li, T. Zhang, A. Said, G. Fabbris, D. G. Mazzone, J. Yan, D. Mandrus, G. B. Hal´ asz, S. Okamoto, S. Mu- rakami, et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 3513 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Kocsis, D

    V. Kocsis, D. A. S. Kaib, K. Riedl, S. Gass, P. Lampen- Kelley, D. G. Mandrus, S. E. Nagler, N. P´ erez, K. Nielsch, B. B¨ uchner, et al., Phys. Rev. B105, 094410 (2022), ISSN 2469-9950, 2469-9969

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Kane and M

    C. Kane and M. P. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15832 (1997)

    work page 1997

  60. [60]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000)

    work page 2000

  61. [61]

    Banerjee, M

    M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, V. Umansky, D. E. Feldman, Y. Oreg, and A. Stern, Nature 559, 205 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Van Vleck, Phys

    J. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev. 57, 426 (1940)

    work page 1940

  63. [63]

    Orbach, Proc

    R. Orbach, Proc. R. soc. Lond. Ser. A-Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. 264, 458 (1961)

    work page 1961

  64. [64]

    Ray and D

    T. Ray and D. Ray, Phys. Rev. 164, 420 (1967)

    work page 1967

  65. [65]

    Capellmann and S

    H. Capellmann and S. Lipinski, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 83, 199 (1991)

    work page 1991

  66. [66]

    Ioselevich and H

    A. Ioselevich and H. Capellmann, Phys. Rev. B 51, 11446 (1995)

    work page 1995

  67. [67]

    Bonini, S

    J. Bonini, S. Ren, D. Vanderbilt, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and S. Coh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 086701 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    S. Ren, J. Bonini, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and D. Van- derbilt, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011041 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Dhakal, S

    R. Dhakal, S. Griffith, K. Choi, and S. M. Winter, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00659 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Barkeshli, S

    M. Barkeshli, S. B. Chung, and X.-L. Qi, Physical Re- view B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 85, 245107 (2012)

    work page 2012

  71. [71]

    C. A. Mead, Reviews of modern physics 64, 51 (1992)

    work page 1992

  72. [72]

    H.-H. Teh, W. Dou, and J. E. Subotnik, Physical Re- view B 106, 184302 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    See supplemental material, which contains references [94–118], for description of ab-initio methods, derivation of phonon thermal transport and Hall viscosity terms, further details of numerical evaluations of κxx and κxy, and notes on low- q scaling of spin-phonon couplings

    work page

  74. [74]

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 077204 (2014)

    work page 2014

  75. [75]

    S. M. Winter, Y. Li, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valent´ ı, Phys. Rev. B 93, 214431 (2016)

    work page 2016

  76. [76]

    Kim and H.-Y

    H.-S. Kim and H.-Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155143 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Yadav, N

    R. Yadav, N. A. Bogdanov, V. M. Katukuri, S. Nishi- moto, J. Van Den Brink, and L. Hozoi, Sci. Rep. 6, 37925 (2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [78]

    K. Ran, J. Wang, W. Wang, Z.-Y. Dong, X. Ren, S. Bao, S. Li, Z. Ma, Y. Gan, Y. Zhang, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 107203 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    S. M. Winter, K. Riedl, P. A. Maksimov, A. L. Cherny- shev, A. Honecker, and R. Valent´ ı, Nat. Commun. 8, 1152 (2017)

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    Eichstaedt, Y

    C. Eichstaedt, Y. Zhang, P. Laurell, S. Okamoto, A. G. Eguiluz, and T. Berlijn, Phys. Rev. B 100, 075110 (2019)

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.