REVIEW 5 cited by
MIRAI: Evaluating LLM Agents for Event Forecasting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have empowered LLM agents to autonomously collect world information, over which to conduct reasoning to solve complex problems. Given this capability, increasing interests have been put into employing LLM agents for predicting international events, which can influence decision-making and shape policy development on an international scale. Despite such a growing interest, there is a lack of a rigorous benchmark of LLM agents' forecasting capability and reliability. To address this gap, we introduce MIRAI, a novel benchmark designed to systematically evaluate LLM agents as temporal forecasters in the context of international events. Our benchmark features an agentic environment with tools for accessing an extensive database of historical, structured events and textual news articles. We refine the GDELT event database with careful cleaning and parsing to curate a series of relational prediction tasks with varying forecasting horizons, assessing LLM agents' abilities from short-term to long-term forecasting. We further implement APIs to enable LLM agents to utilize different tools via a code-based interface. In summary, MIRAI comprehensively evaluates the agents' capabilities in three dimensions: 1) autonomously source and integrate critical information from large global databases; 2) write codes using domain-specific APIs and libraries for tool-use; and 3) jointly reason over historical knowledge from diverse formats and time to accurately predict future events. Through comprehensive benchmarking, we aim to establish a reliable framework for assessing the capabilities of LLM agents in forecasting international events, thereby contributing to the development of more accurate and trustworthy models for international relation analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Hindcast: Replaying Prediction Markets to Evaluate LLM Forecasters
When forecasters are barred from reading post-cutoff text, retrieval still improves Brier score on 8 of 9 LLMs, but only on markets Reddit had discussed beforehand; on speculative topics retrieval makes forecasts worse.
-
Robust Human-AI Complementarity under Uncertainty
Negative human-AI error correlation is required for robust complementarity under uncertainty about AI quality; current LLMs exhibit positive correlations on forecasting tasks.
-
FutureOmni: Evaluating Future Forecasting from Omni-Modal Context for Multimodal LLMs
FutureOmni, a 919-video, 1,034-question audio-visual future-forecasting benchmark, shows top MLLMs reach only 64.8% accuracy, and OFF tuning improves open models.
-
Advancing Event Forecasting through Massive Training of Large Language Models: Challenges, Solutions, and Broader Impacts
A position paper advocating large-scale training of event forecasting LLMs, with proposals for label selection, counterfactual training data, auxiliary rewards, and multi-source datasets.
-
Unraveling Spatio-Temporal Foundation Models via the Pipeline Lens: A Comprehensive Review
Spatio-temporal foundation models are organized into a pipeline of data harmonization, model design, training, and adaptation, with a data property taxonomy for model selection.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.