Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Towards Federated RLHF with Aggregated Client Preference for LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.03038 v3 pith:LZVGL7G6 submitted 2024-07-03 cs.CL cs.DCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.DCcs.LG
keywords preferencepreferencesfederatedrlhfclientdatafedbiscuithuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) fine-tunes a pretrained large language model (LLM) using user preference data, enabling it to generate content aligned with human preferences. However, due to privacy concerns, users may be reluctant to share sensitive preference data. To address this, we propose utilizing Federated Learning (FL) techniques, allowing large-scale preference collection from diverse real-world users without requiring them to transmit data to a central server. Our federated RLHF methods (i.e., FedBis and FedBiscuit) encode each client's preferences into binary selectors and aggregate them to capture common preferences. In particular, FedBiscuit overcomes key challenges, such as preference heterogeneity and reward hacking, through innovative solutions like grouping clients with similar preferences to reduce heterogeneity and using multiple binary selectors to enhance LLM output quality. To evaluate the performance of the proposed methods, we establish the first federated RLHF benchmark with a heterogeneous human preference dataset. Experimental results show that by integrating the LLM with aggregated client preferences, FedBis and FedBiscuit significantly enhance the professionalism and readability of the generated content.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FIRM: Federated In-client Regularized Multi-objective Alignment for Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Regularizing each client's local MGDA step in federated multi-objective LLM alignment provably controls client disagreement drift and yields Pareto-stationary convergence in a simplified actor-critic setting.

  2. PEFT-as-an-Attack! Jailbreaking Language Models during Federated Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning

    cs.CR 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Poisoning PEFT modules in federated fine-tuning is a jailbreak vector that defeats robust aggregation under non-IID data, while post-hoc realignment trades safety for accuracy.

Pith tools