Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Future Events as Backdoor Triggers: Investigating Temporal Vulnerabilities in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.04108 v3 pith:CKZRRUQP submitted 2024-07-04 cs.CR cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelbackdoorbackdoorsmodelsdataeventsfutureactivation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Backdoors are hidden behaviors that are only triggered once an AI system has been deployed. Bad actors looking to create successful backdoors must design them to avoid activation during training and evaluation. Since data used in these stages often only contains information about events that have already occurred, a component of a simple backdoor trigger could be a model recognizing data that is in the future relative to when it was trained. Through prompting experiments and by probing internal activations, we show that current large language models (LLMs) can distinguish past from future events, with probes on model activations achieving 90% accuracy. We train models with backdoors triggered by a temporal distributional shift; they activate when the model is exposed to news headlines beyond their training cut-off dates. Fine-tuning on helpful, harmless and honest (HHH) data does not work well for removing simpler backdoor triggers but is effective on our backdoored models, although this distinction is smaller for the larger-scale model we tested. We also find that an activation-steering vector representing a model's internal representation of the date influences the rate of backdoor activation. We take these results as initial evidence that, at least for models at the modest scale we test, standard safety measures are enough to remove these backdoors.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mechanistic Exploration of Backdoored Large Language Model Attention Patterns

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Backdoored Qwen2.5-3B models show attention deviations concentrated in layers 20-30, with single-token triggers localized and multi-token triggers diffuse.

  2. A Systematic Review of Poisoning Attacks Against Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review that organizes 65 LLM poisoning papers into a threat model with four attack specifications and generalized metrics.

Pith tools