Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

See Further for Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning by Standing on the Shoulders of Decomposition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.05417 v2 pith:DWCN364H submitted 2024-07-07 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords peftfine-tuningmethodsacrossmodelsperformancetechniquesanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid expansion of large foundation models within the pre-training and fine-tuning framework has underscored that larger models often yield better results. However, the scaling up of large foundation models has led to soaring costs in fine-tuning and parameter storage, rendering extensive adaptations impractical. This challenge has sparked the development of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT), which focuses on optimizing a select subset of parameters while keeping the rest fixed, significantly lowering computational and storage overheads. While recent years have witnessed a significant success in PEFT, a deep understanding of the fundamental principles behind these methods remains unexplored. To this end, here we take the first step to unify all approaches by dissecting them from a decomposition perspective. We initiate a comprehensive mathematical analysis of these methods, allowing us to delve deeply into their underlying mechanisms, and we explore the reasons behind the variations in performance among different techniques. Furthermore, inspired by our theoretical analysis, we introduce two novel PEFT methods alongside a simple yet effective framework designed to enhance the performance of PEFT techniques across various applications. Our empirical validations, conducted across multiple datasets, demonstrate the efficacy of these methods, showcasing both theoretical validity and practical performance improvements under the guidance of our analytical findings. We believe our work will deepen researchers' understanding of PEFT and other techniques, prompting further contemplation and advancing the research across the whole community.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why Can Accurate Models Be Learned from Inaccurate Annotations?

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Principal subspaces of classifier weights are largely preserved under moderate label inaccuracy, which explains why models still learn from noisy labels.

  2. Weight Spectra Induced Efficient Model Adaptation

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning mostly amplifies and reorients the top singular directions of weight matrices, and SpecLoRA learns to rescale a top-left block plus LoRA to improve PEFT performance.

Pith tools