REVIEW 4 cited by
Behind the Deepfake: 8% Create; 90% Concerned. Surveying public exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes in the UK
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This article examines public exposure to and perceptions of deepfakes based on insights from a nationally representative survey of 1403 UK adults. The survey is one of the first of its kind since recent improvements in deepfake technology and widespread adoption of political deepfakes. The findings reveal three key insights. First, on average, 15% of people report exposure to harmful deepfakes, including deepfake pornography, deepfake frauds/scams and other potentially harmful deepfakes such as those that spread health/religious misinformation/propaganda. In terms of common targets, exposure to deepfakes featuring celebrities was 50.2%, whereas those featuring politicians was 34.1%. And 5.7% of respondents recall exposure to a selection of high profile political deepfakes in the UK. Second, while exposure to harmful deepfakes was relatively low, awareness of and fears about deepfakes were high (and women were significantly more likely to report experiencing such fears than men). As with fears, general concerns about the spread of deepfakes were also high; 90.4% of the respondents were either very concerned or somewhat concerned about this issue. Most respondents (at least 91.8%) were concerned that deepfakes could add to online child sexual abuse material, increase distrust in information and manipulate public opinion. Third, while awareness about deepfakes was high, usage of deepfake tools was relatively low (8%). Most respondents were not confident about their detection abilities and were trustful of audiovisual content online. Our work highlights how the problem of deepfakes has become embedded in public consciousness in just a few years; it also highlights the need for media literacy programmes and other policy interventions to address the spread of harmful deepfakes.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Ingroup bias is prevalent in user reports of hate and abuse online
Across five mock-feed experiments, participants flagged ingroup-directed hate and abuse more than outgroup-directed abuse, while still flagging roughly half of abusive comments.
-
A Fourier Explanation of AI-music Artifacts
Zero-upsampling in audio generators replicates the low-frequency spectrum at fixed intervals, creating architecture-dependent spectral peaks that enable a simple, interpretable detector for AI-generated music.
-
Identity Deepfake Threats to Biometric Authentication Systems: Public and Expert Perspectives
A UK-based mixed-methods study finds a wide gap between public trust in biometrics and expert concern about deepfake spoofing, and proposes a tri-layer mitigation framework.
-
Characterizing AI-Generated Misinformation on Social Media
AI-generated misinformation on X, identified via Community Notes and an LLM, differs from conventional misinformation in content, source accounts, and virality, but the evidence is weakened by selection and measuremen...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.