Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Optimizing and Evaluating a Retrieval Augmented QA Chatbot using LLMs with Human in the Loop

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.05925 v1 pith:SULAHUOY submitted 2024-07-08 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords evaluationchatbothumanefficientemployeeinquiriesmodelsretrieval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models have found application in various mundane and repetitive tasks including Human Resource (HR) support. We worked with the domain experts of SAP SE to develop an HR support chatbot as an efficient and effective tool for addressing employee inquiries. We inserted a human-in-the-loop in various parts of the development cycles such as dataset collection, prompt optimization, and evaluation of generated output. By enhancing the LLM-driven chatbot's response quality and exploring alternative retrieval methods, we have created an efficient, scalable, and flexible tool for HR professionals to address employee inquiries effectively. Our experiments and evaluation conclude that GPT-4 outperforms other models and can overcome inconsistencies in data through internal reasoning capabilities. Additionally, through expert analysis, we infer that reference-free evaluation metrics such as G-Eval and Prometheus demonstrate reliability closely aligned with that of human evaluation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Can LLMs Be Trusted for Evaluating RAG Systems? A Survey of Methods and Datasets

    cs.IR 2025-04 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 63 RAG evaluation papers concludes that LLM-based automation is feasible across dataset generation, retrieval scoring, and answer evaluation, but only six studies directly compare LLM judges wit...

Pith tools