Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10956 v1 pith:FZ6GZLVQ submitted 2024-07-15 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords dataagentsmultimodalworkflowscodeengineeringsciencespider2-v
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data science and engineering workflows often span multiple stages, from warehousing to orchestration, using tools like BigQuery, dbt, and Airbyte. As vision language models (VLMs) advance in multimodal understanding and code generation, VLM-based agents could potentially automate these workflows by generating SQL queries, Python code, and GUI operations. This automation can improve the productivity of experts while democratizing access to large-scale data analysis. In this paper, we introduce Spider2-V, the first multimodal agent benchmark focusing on professional data science and engineering workflows, featuring 494 real-world tasks in authentic computer environments and incorporating 20 enterprise-level professional applications. These tasks, derived from real-world use cases, evaluate the ability of a multimodal agent to perform data-related tasks by writing code and managing the GUI in enterprise data software systems. To balance realistic simulation with evaluation simplicity, we devote significant effort to developing automatic configurations for task setup and carefully crafting evaluation metrics for each task. Furthermore, we supplement multimodal agents with comprehensive documents of these enterprise data software systems. Our empirical evaluation reveals that existing state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents do not reliably automate full data workflows (14.0% success). Even with step-by-step guidance, these agents still underperform in tasks that require fine-grained, knowledge-intensive GUI actions (16.2%) and involve remote cloud-hosted workspaces (10.6%). We hope that Spider2-V paves the way for autonomous multimodal agents to transform the automation of data science and engineering workflow. Our code and data are available at https://spider2-v.github.io.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent Capabilities

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-generating graph benchmark produces 36k GUI agent tasks with controllable complexity and ten capability scores, and fine-tuning on its trajectories gives small gains on AndroidControl and OmniAct.

  2. CoddLLM: Empowering Large Language Models for Data Analytics

    cs.DB 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoddLLM, a Mistral-NeMo-12B model post-trained on synthetic analytics instruction data, outperforms GPT-4o on the paper's table-selection average and improves text-to-SQL over its base model, with the largest gains on...

  3. Augmented Vision-Language Models: A Systematic Review

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A structured taxonomy of inference-time augmentation techniques that connect vision-language models to external symbolic systems, tools, and knowledge sources.

  4. Tabular Data Understanding with LLMs: A Survey of Recent Advances and Challenges

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured review of table understanding with LLMs that proposes a taxonomy of input representations and identifies three research gaps.

Pith tools