Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Empirical Evaluation of Public HateSpeech Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.12018 v1 pith:24OOJSFA submitted 2024-06-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords datasetshatespeechlimitationsplatformspublicalgorithmsclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite the extensive communication benefits offered by social media platforms, numerous challenges must be addressed to ensure user safety. One of the most significant risks faced by users on these platforms is targeted hate speech. Social media platforms are widely utilised for generating datasets employed in training and evaluating machine learning algorithms for hate speech detection. However, existing public datasets exhibit numerous limitations, hindering the effective training of these algorithms and leading to inaccurate hate speech classification. This study provides a comprehensive empirical evaluation of several public datasets commonly used in automated hate speech classification. Through rigorous analysis, we present compelling evidence highlighting the limitations of current hate speech datasets. Additionally, we conduct a range of statistical analyses to elucidate the strengths and weaknesses inherent in these datasets. This work aims to advance the development of more accurate and reliable machine learning models for hate speech detection by addressing the dataset limitations identified.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Socio-Culturally Aware Evaluation Framework for LLM-Based Content Moderation

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A persona-based generation pipeline creates culturally varied content moderation test sets, but its central 'greater challenge' claim depends on unvalidated synthetic labels and unreleased data.

Pith tools