REVIEW 1 cited by
Reduced Effectiveness of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks on Functions with Noise
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
It has been observed that even a small amount of noise introduced into the dataset can significantly degrade the performance of KAN. In this brief note, we aim to quantitatively evaluate the performance when noise is added to the dataset. We propose an oversampling technique combined with denoising to alleviate the impact of noise. Specifically, we employ kernel filtering based on diffusion maps for pre-filtering the noisy data for training KAN network. Our experiments show that while adding i.i.d. noise with any fixed SNR, when we increase the amount of training data by a factor of $r$, the test-loss (RMSE) of KANs will exhibit a performance trend like $\text{test-loss} \sim \mathcal{O}(r^{-\frac{1}{2}})$ as $r\to +\infty$. We conclude that applying both oversampling and filtering strategies can reduce the detrimental effects of noise. Nevertheless, determining the optimal variance for the kernel filtering process is challenging, and enhancing the volume of training data substantially increases the associated costs, because the training dataset needs to be expanded multiple times in comparison to the initial clean data. As a result, the noise present in the data ultimately diminishes the effectiveness of Kolmogorov-Arnold networks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Efficiency Bottlenecks of Convolutional Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Comprehensive Scrutiny with ImageNet, AlexNet, LeNet and Tabular Classification
CKANs are measurably less efficient than standard CNNs, and on ImageNet the accuracy gap is large, but the paper's baseline and timing comparisons are not controlled.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.