Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

LoRA-Pro: Are Low-Rank Adapters Properly Optimized?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.18242 v3 pith:6NW7ARLR submitted 2024-07-25 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords fine-tuningloralow-rankfulllora-progradientperformancegradients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Low-rank adaptation, also known as LoRA, has emerged as a prominent method for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of foundation models. Despite its computational efficiency, LoRA still yields inferior performance compared to full fine-tuning. In this paper, we first uncover a fundamental connection between the optimization processes of LoRA and full fine-tuning: using LoRA for optimization is mathematically equivalent to full fine-tuning using a low-rank gradient for parameter updates. And this low-rank gradient can be expressed in terms of the gradients of the two low-rank matrices in LoRA. Leveraging this insight, we introduce LoRA-Pro, a method that enhances LoRA's performance by strategically adjusting the gradients of these low-rank matrices. This adjustment allows the low-rank gradient to more accurately approximate the full fine-tuning gradient, thereby narrowing the performance gap between LoRA and full fine-tuning. Furthermore, we theoretically derive the optimal solutions for adjusting the gradients of the low-rank matrices, applying them during fine-tuning in LoRA-Pro. We conduct extensive experiments across natural language understanding, dialogue generation, mathematical reasoning, code generation, and image classification tasks, demonstrating that LoRA-Pro substantially improves LoRA's performance, effectively narrowing the gap with full fine-tuning. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/mrflogs/LoRA-Pro.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sparsity-Aware Low-Rank Representation for Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    SALR combines static pruning of frozen weights with a trainable truncated-SVD low-rank residual adapter to match LoRA accuracy at 50% sparsity, cutting model size ~2x and giving ~1.7x inference speedup.

  2. SOS-LoRA: Static Orthogonal-Subspace Low-Rank Adaptation with Fixed Multi-Scale Scaling

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A LoRA update split into several fixed, differently-scaled low-rank experts with orthogonal input directions improves fine-tuning accuracy at the same parameter count.

  3. A Language-Guided Bayesian Optimization for Efficient LoRA Hyperparameter Search

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM embeddings plus Bayesian optimization find better LoRA hyperparameters in ~30 proxy trials than standard published settings.

  4. ScatterPrism: convergence for generative simulation and inverse problems in particle and nuclear physics

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Standard Conditional Flow Matching loss is a misleading early plateau; physics-informed metrics keep improving, so ScatterPrism and multi-metric diagnostics are needed for kinematic fidelity.

  5. Scalable Parameter and Memory Efficient Pretraining for LLM: Recent Algorithmic Advances and Benchmarking

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A benchmark and two low-cost tricks (weight refactorization and momentum reset) that make low-rank LLM pre-training competitive with GaLore and Fira at about 25% lower memory.

  6. CoLA: Collaborative Low-Rank Adaptation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    CoLA generalizes LoRA to multiple A and B matrices with a principal-component initialization and reports gains of roughly 2-4 accuracy points over PiSSA on low-sample fine-tuning benchmarks.

Pith tools