Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding How Blind Users Handle Object Recognition Errors: Strategies and Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.03303 v1 pith:N66VBK2S submitted 2024-08-06 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords errorsobjectrecognitionblindparticipantsuserserroridentifying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Object recognition technologies hold the potential to support blind and low-vision people in navigating the world around them. However, the gap between benchmark performances and practical usability remains a significant challenge. This paper presents a study aimed at understanding blind users' interaction with object recognition systems for identifying and avoiding errors. Leveraging a pre-existing object recognition system, URCam, fine-tuned for our experiment, we conducted a user study involving 12 blind and low-vision participants. Through in-depth interviews and hands-on error identification tasks, we gained insights into users' experiences, challenges, and strategies for identifying errors in camera-based assistive technologies and object recognition systems. During interviews, many participants preferred independent error review, while expressing apprehension toward misrecognitions. In the error identification task, participants varied viewpoints, backgrounds, and object sizes in their images to avoid and overcome errors. Even after repeating the task, participants identified only half of the errors, and the proportion of errors identified did not significantly differ from their first attempts. Based on these insights, we offer implications for designing accessible interfaces tailored to the needs of blind and low-vision users in identifying object recognition errors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Surfacing variations across multiple MLLM image descriptions increases blind and low vision users' detection of unreliable claims and reduces their over-trust in a single AI description.

Pith tools