REVIEW 4 cited by
Affective Computing in the Era of Large Language Models: A Survey from the NLP Perspective
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Affective Computing (AC) integrates computer science, psychology, and cognitive science to enable machines to recognize, interpret, and simulate human emotions across domains such as social media, finance, healthcare, and education. AC commonly centers on two task families: Affective Understanding (AU) and Affective Generation (AG). While fine-tuned pre-trained language models (PLMs) have achieved solid AU performance, they often generalize poorly across tasks and remain limited for AG, especially in producing diverse, emotionally appropriate responses. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) (e.g., ChatGPT and LLaMA) has catalyzed a paradigm shift by offering in-context learning, broader world knowledge, and stronger sequence generation. This survey presents an NLP-oriented overview of AC in the LLM era. We (i) consolidate traditional AC tasks and preliminary LLM-based studies; (ii) review adaptation techniques that improve AU/AG, including Instruction Tuning (full and parameter-efficient methods such as LoRA, P-/Prompt-Tuning), Prompt Engineering (zero/few-shot, chain-of-thought, agent-based prompting), and Reinforcement Learning. For the latter, we summarize RL from human preferences (RLHF), verifiable/programmatic rewards (RLVR), and AI feedback (RLAIF), which provide preference- or rule-grounded optimization signals that can help steer AU/AG toward empathy, safety, and planning, achieving finer-grained or multi-objective control. To assess progress, we compile benchmarks and evaluation practices for both AU and AG. We also discuss open challenges-from ethics, data quality, and safety to robust evaluation and resource efficiency-and outline research directions. We hope this survey clarifies the landscape and offers practical guidance for building affect-aware, reliable, and responsible LLM systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
EmoScene: A Dual-space Dataset for Controllable Affective Image Generation
EmoScene contributes 1.2M images annotated with discrete emotions, continuous VAD scores, perceptual attributes, and captions, plus a cross-attention modulation that shifts generated images toward requested affective targets.
-
MICA: Multi-granularity Intertemporal Credit Assignment for Long-Horizon Emotional Support Dialogue
MICA mixes per-turn and whole-trajectory normalized reward signals to train emotional-support chatbots, outperforming GRPO and REINFORCE++ on EMPA, EQ-Bench, and EmoBench.
-
DinoCompanion: An Attachment-Theory Informed Multimodal Robot for Emotionally Responsive Child-AI Interaction
A child-facing robot trained with an attachment-theory-informed preference optimization is claimed to beat GPT-4o and Gemini-2.5-Pro on a new ten-competency benchmark, though evaluation and derivation issues undermine...
-
Affective-CARA: A Knowledge Graph Driven Framework for Culturally Adaptive Emotional Intelligence in HCI
Affective-CARA integrates a hyperbolic culture emotion graph, a PPO-style reward optimizer, and a response mediator for culturally adaptive chatbot replies, but its headline metrics do not measure the claimed system behavior.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.