Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

COAST: Enhancing the Code Debugging Ability of LLMs through Communicative Agent Based Data Synthesis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.05006 v3 pith:WL3H4D5E submitted 2024-08-09 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords codedebuggingdatallmscoastevaluatingb-scalecommunicative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Code debugging is a vital stage of software development, essential for ensuring the reliability and performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the code generation task. Human debugging typically follows a multi-stage process, which includes Bug Localization, Bug Identification, Code Repair, and Code Recognition. However, existing code debugging benchmarks predominantly focus on the Code Repair stage, which offers only a limited perspective on evaluating the debugging capabilities of LLMs. In this paper, we introduce DEBUGEVAL, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the debugging abilities of LLMs by emulating the multi-stage human debugging process. Through evaluating on DEBUGEVAL, we observe that 7B-scale models consistently underperform compared to their larger counterparts, highlighting their limitations in comprehending code semantics. In this case, we propose the COmmunicative Agent-based data SynThesis (COAST) framework, which employs a multi-agent system to generate high-quality training data for supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Experimental results demonstrate that COAST-generated data outperform human-curated and GPT-4-generated data, enabling 7B-scale LLMs to achieve debugging performance comparable to GPT-3.5. All data and codes are available at https://github.com/NEUIR/COAST.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RepoDebug: Repository-Level Multi-Task and Multi-Language Debugging Evaluation of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RepoDebug is a new multi-language, multi-task benchmark for repository-level code debugging on which current LLMs, including the best model Claude 3.5 Sonnet, perform poorly.

  2. IFEvalCode: Controlled Code Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 1,620-sample, 8-language, Chinese/English benchmark separates code correctness from instruction-following and shows instruction compliance is far lower than correctness across 40+ LLMs.

Pith tools