Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 7 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2408.10406.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2408.10406 v2

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 7 of 7 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00

measured 7 of 7 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-14T04:44:37.495158Z

measured 1 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

2
arxiv_reference, observed 2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 56684475-6969-406f-9502-17146d14da42 · inbound

G321.93-0.01: A Rare Site of Multiple Hub-Filament Systems with Evidence of Collision and Merging of Filaments cites this paper.

G321.93-0.01: A Rare Site of Multiple Hub-Filament Systems with Evidence of Collision and Merging of Filaments The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

Reference 108

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-12T15:52:58.315472Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-12T15:52:58.315472Z digest=sha256:9139ec07edeb5f2fd6feb90c5e9d293658bc6090569b03df576648fe99ce2a3d

Observation 20a55b18-7d5a-4d64-9959-a1a2de0710ea · inbound

Examining Turbulence in Galactic Molecular Clouds -- I: A Statistical Analysis of Velocity Structures cites this paper.

Examining Turbulence in Galactic Molecular Clouds -- I: A Statistical Analysis of Velocity Structures The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

Reference 51

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T17:52:31.831361Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-10T17:52:31.831361Z digest=sha256:bf30756225ee493ea048735801479e75dd8ac5c750fc2657ae56dffbd661d671

Observation d86d0a10-8ca6-40df-b4a4-f3f5a084f0de · inbound

The Rosetta Stone Project. II. The correlation between star formation efficiency and L/M indicator for the evolutionary stages of star-forming clumps in post-processed radiative magnetohydrodynamics simulations cites this paper.

The Rosetta Stone Project. II. The correlation between star formation efficiency and L/M indicator for the evolutionary stages of star-forming clumps in post-processed radiative magnetohydrodynamics simulations The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

Reference 51

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:52:01.321076Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-06T17:52:01.321076Z digest=sha256:3712b7ed172379b78e02b5df299905180f5c846a47def8aeac90593083281dc1

Observation 7e0ee522-e132-41f8-8d8b-bc04846ab30d · inbound

The Rosetta Stone project. III. ALMA synthetic observations of fragmentation in high-mass star-forming clumps cites this paper.

The Rosetta Stone project. III. ALMA synthetic observations of fragmentation in high-mass star-forming clumps The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

Reference 95

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T17:26:02.918169Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-06T17:26:02.918169Z digest=sha256:79ce490a4fcc47e9caddceb84d65c81844c61f71883465d53ef79aca4c2f5b25

Observation 69641437-965c-41ab-a512-85f159ec1a46 · inbound

The Impact of Radiation Environment on the Evolution and Fragmentation of Protostellar Discs cites this paper.

The Impact of Radiation Environment on the Evolution and Fragmentation of Protostellar Discs The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

Reference 296

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-08T20:39:11.317416Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-05-08T16:06:34.994429Z digest=sha256:e02513a96a28c2f5e7053c3603a91364ee6c2554b547a5b8732389ed52e741cc

Observation b6bc97df-2161-4413-a373-abfaaa769a5f · inbound

Early phases of star formation with SKAO: synchrotron emission from dense starless cores in molecular clouds cites this paper.

Early phases of star formation with SKAO: synchrotron emission from dense starless cores in molecular clouds The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

Reference 149

Resolution
metadata mismatch
arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-25T23:08:41.481436Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-06-25T23:03:50.905177Z digest=sha256:9fd2a84cd7ef3034e1c36e36fb45a0dbcec8865689ff961b05c34e4e947e77bd

Observation 96c1040c-32be-45f8-9656-3454a1bf9772 · inbound

The ALMA carbon monoxide supernova (ACOS) survey II. Turbulent giant molecular clouds at the positions of core-collapse supernovae cites this paper.

The ALMA carbon monoxide supernova (ACOS) survey II. Turbulent giant molecular clouds at the positions of core-collapse supernovae The Turbulent Support (TS) and Global Hierarchical Collapse (GHC) models for molecular clouds compared. Differences, convergence, and myths

Reference 191

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-14T04:44:37.495158Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-14T04:44:37.495158Z digest=sha256:9ced20099cce162f98d75c837489fb2f87938bd2cce55053e1fd104d0dbf16de