REVIEW 2 cited by
Simplifying Random Forests' Probabilistic Forecasts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Since their introduction by Breiman, Random Forests (RFs) have proven to be useful for both classification and regression tasks. The RF prediction of a previously unseen observation can be represented as a weighted sum of all training sample observations. This nearest-neighbor-type representation is useful, among other things, for constructing forecast distributions (Meinshausen, 2006). In this paper, we consider simplifying RF-based forecast distributions by sparsifying them. That is, we focus on a small subset of $k$ nearest neighbors while setting the remaining weights to zero. This simplification, which we refer to as `Top$k$', greatly improves the interpretability of RF predictions. It can be applied to any forecasting task without re-training existing RF models. In empirical experiments, we document that the simplified predictions can be similar to or exceed the original ones in terms of forecasting performance. We explore the statistical sources of this finding via a stylized analytical model of RFs. The model suggests that simplification is particularly promising if the unknown true forecast distribution contains many small weights that are estimated imprecisely.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
An Adaptive Moving Average for Macroeconomic Monitoring
A random forest trained only on a time trend produces an adaptive moving average that shortens its window around breaks, yielding a different post-pandemic inflation narrative than fixed 12-month averages.
-
Dual Interpretation of Machine Learning Forecasts
A unified dual-space decomposition turns machine learning forecasts into weighted combinations of historical observations, with weights interpretable as proximity scores and portfolio-like diagnostics.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.