Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Russian-focused embedders' exploration: ruMTEB benchmark and Russian embedding model design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12503 v2 pith:PK22GE3B submitted 2024-08-22 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords benchmarkembeddingrussianmodelmodelstextrumtebframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Embedding models play a crucial role in Natural Language Processing (NLP) by creating text embeddings used in various tasks such as information retrieval and assessing semantic text similarity. This paper focuses on research related to embedding models in the Russian language. It introduces a new Russian-focused embedding model called ru-en-RoSBERTa and the ruMTEB benchmark, the Russian version extending the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB). Our benchmark includes seven categories of tasks, such as semantic textual similarity, text classification, reranking, and retrieval.The research also assesses a representative set of Russian and multilingual models on the proposed benchmark. The findings indicate that the new model achieves results that are on par with state-of-the-art models in Russian. We release the model ru-en-RoSBERTa, and the ruMTEB framework comes with open-source code, integration into the original framework and a public leaderboard.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Large Language Models in the Task of Automatic Validation of Text Classifier Predictions

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-based annotators using token-probability thresholds, RAG, and reasoning fine-tuning matched or exceeded human annotator quality on a proprietary 250-class intent-validation task.

Pith tools