REVIEW 2 cited by
The Future of Open Human Feedback
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Human feedback on conversations with language language models (LLMs) is central to how these systems learn about the world, improve their capabilities, and are steered toward desirable and safe behaviors. However, this feedback is mostly collected by frontier AI labs and kept behind closed doors. In this work, we bring together interdisciplinary experts to assess the opportunities and challenges to realizing an open ecosystem of human feedback for AI. We first look for successful practices in peer production, open source, and citizen science communities. We then characterize the main challenges for open human feedback. For each, we survey current approaches and offer recommendations. We end by envisioning the components needed to underpin a sustainable and open human feedback ecosystem. In the center of this ecosystem are mutually beneficial feedback loops, between users and specialized models, incentivizing a diverse stakeholders community of model trainers and feedback providers to support a general open feedback pool.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Leaderboard Illusion
Chatbot Arena's rankings are systematically distorted by undisclosed private testing, selective score reporting, and data access asymmetries that favor large proprietary providers.
-
How Individual Traits and Language Styles Shape Preferences In Open-ended User-LLM Interaction: A Preliminary Study
People prefer different chatbot writing styles depending on their own personality and trust in LLMs, according to two preliminary regression-based studies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.