REVIEW 3 cited by
Pre-Training Multimodal Hallucination Detectors with Corrupted Grounding Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal language models can exhibit hallucinations in their outputs, which limits their reliability. The ability to automatically detect these errors is important for mitigating them, but has been less explored and existing efforts do not localize hallucinations, instead framing this as a classification task. In this work, we first pose multimodal hallucination detection as a sequence labeling task where models must localize hallucinated text spans and present a strong baseline model. Given the high cost of human annotations for this task, we propose an approach to improve the sample efficiency of these models by creating corrupted grounding data, which we use for pre-training. Leveraging phrase grounding data, we generate hallucinations to replace grounded spans and create hallucinated text. Experiments show that pre-training on this data improves sample efficiency when fine-tuning, and that the learning signal from the grounding data plays an important role in these improvements.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
UniProbe: A Learnable Token-Level Hallucination Detector for Large VLMs using Multi-Structural Internal Representations
UniProbe detects hallucinated tokens in frozen LVLMs by jointly modeling attention graphs, image geometry, and response order, and uses this signal to resample bad tokens during generation.
-
HalluScope: Fine-grained Hallucination Diagnosis for Multimodal Large Language Models
HalluScope couples span-level hallucination detection, 12-way type classification, and explanation generation in one model, and shows the resulting feedback reduces hallucinations in two MLLMs.
-
Delve into Visual Contrastive Decoding for Hallucination Mitigation of Large Vision-Language Models
Entropy-weighted fusion of four visually distorted contrastive samples gives the best overall accuracy (0.833) across three LVLMs on POPE and MME, outperforming single-sample contrastive decoding (best single: 0.824).
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.