Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rethinking KenLM: Good and Bad Model Ensembles for Efficient Text Quality Filtering in Large Web Corpora

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.09613 v1 pith:RE53LYEV submitted 2024-09-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords kenlmdatahigh-qualitylargemethodapproachcontentcorpora
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the increasing demand for substantial amounts of high-quality data to train large language models (LLMs), efficiently filtering large web corpora has become a critical challenge. For this purpose, KenLM, a lightweight n-gram-based language model that operates on CPUs, is widely used. However, the traditional method of training KenLM utilizes only high-quality data and, consequently, does not explicitly learn the linguistic patterns of low-quality data. To address this issue, we propose an ensemble approach that leverages two contrasting KenLMs: (i) Good KenLM, trained on high-quality data; and (ii) Bad KenLM, trained on low-quality data. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach significantly reduces noisy content while preserving high-quality content compared to the traditional KenLM training method. This indicates that our method can be a practical solution with minimal computational overhead for resource-constrained environments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LP Data Pipeline: Lightweight, Purpose-driven Data Pipeline for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    This paper presents a CPU-only data curation pipeline for LLMs, but the central claim of high-quality output is not supported by any training or quality evaluation.

Pith tools