Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CAST: Cross-modal Alignment Similarity Test for Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.11007 v1 pith:YBX47OOS submitted 2024-09-17 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords modelsvlmsassesslanguagetestalignmentcapablecast
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision Language Models (VLMs) are typically evaluated with Visual Question Answering (VQA) tasks which assess a model's understanding of scenes. Good VQA performance is taken as evidence that the model will perform well on a broader range of tasks that require both visual and language inputs. However, scene-aware VQA does not fully capture input biases or assess hallucinations caused by a misalignment between modalities. To address this, we propose a Cross-modal Alignment Similarity Test (CAST) to probe VLMs for self-consistency across modalities. This test involves asking the models to identify similarities between two scenes through text-only, image-only, or both and then assess the truthfulness of the similarities they generate. Since there is no ground-truth to compare against, this evaluation does not focus on objective accuracy but rather on whether VLMs are internally consistent in their outputs. We argue that while not all self-consistent models are capable or accurate, all capable VLMs must be self-consistent.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Critic-V: VLM Critics Help Catch VLM Errors in Multimodal Reasoning

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A DPO-trained VLM critic that critiques and iteratively refines a reasoning VLM improves accuracy on several multimodal benchmarks, with large gains on MathVista and RealWorldQA.

Pith tools