REVIEW 3 cited by
Time Awareness in Large Language Models: Benchmarking Fact Recall Across Time
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Who is the US President? The answer changes depending on when the question is asked. While large language models (LLMs) are evaluated on various reasoning tasks, they often miss a crucial dimension: time. In real-world scenarios, the correctness of answers is frequently tied to temporal context. To address this gap, we present a novel framework and dataset spanning over 8,000 events from 2018 to 2024, annotated with day-level granularity and sourced globally across domains such as politics, science, and business. Our TimeShift evaluation method systematically probes LLMs for temporal reasoning, revealing that base models often outperform instruction-tuned and synthetic-trained counterparts on time-sensitive recall. Additionally, we find that even large-scale models exhibit brittleness in handling paraphrased facts, highlighting unresolved challenges in temporal consistency. By identifying these limitations, our work provides a significant step toward advancing time-aware language models capable of adapting to the dynamic nature of real-world knowledge.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Temporal Preference Concepts and their Functions in a Large Language Model
Temporal preference in Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 localizes to layers 17–35 (especially L24 attention), has curved residual-stream geometry, is behaviorally unstable, and can be bidirectionally steered.
-
LexKairos: Benchmarking Legal Temporal Capabilities in LLMs
LexKairos provides a nine-sub-task Chinese legal temporal benchmark and shows that current LLMs, despite strong case chronology performance, remain weak at statutory version recall and procedural time-limit reasoning.
-
Right Knowledge, Wrong Answer: Characterizing Parametric Temporal Conflict in Open-Weight Language Models
Temporal Attractor Steering resolves 29-57% of parametric temporal conflicts in open-weight LLMs while preserving 85-99% accuracy on non-conflict queries.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.