Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Multi-Agent Approach to Fault Localization via Graph-Based Retrieval and Reflexion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.13642 v2 pith:XH2ZPKFT submitted 2024-09-20 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords faultlocalizationaccuracyagentcoveragemethodstechniquescode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Identifying and resolving software faults remains a challenging and resource-intensive process. Traditional fault localization techniques, such as Spectrum-Based Fault Localization (SBFL), leverage statistical analysis of test coverage but often suffer from limited accuracy. While learning-based approaches improve fault localization, they demand extensive training datasets and high computational resources. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new opportunities by enhancing code understanding and reasoning. However, existing LLM-based fault localization techniques face significant challenges, including token limitations, performance degradation with long inputs, and scalability issues in complex software systems. To overcome these obstacles, we propose LLM4FL, a multi-agent fault localization framework that utilizes three specialized LLM agents. First, the Context Extraction Agent applies an order-sensitive segmentation strategy to partition large coverage data within the LLM's token limit, analyze failure context, and prioritize failure-related methods. The Debugger Agent then processes the extracted data, which employs graph-based retrieval-augmented code navigation to reason about failure causes and rank suspicious methods. Finally, the Reviewer Agent re-evaluates the identified faulty methods using verbal reinforcement learning, engaging in self-criticism and iterative refinement. Evaluated on the Defects4J (V2.0.0) benchmark, which includes 675 faults from 14 Java projects, LLM4FL achieves an 18.55\% improvement in Top-1 accuracy over AutoFL and 4.82\% over SoapFL. It outperforms supervised techniques such as DeepFL and Grace, all without requiring task-specific training. Furthermore, its coverage segmentation and prompt chaining strategies enhance performance, increasing Top-1 accuracy by up to 22\%.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Retrieval-Oriented Code Representations in Agentic Bug Localization

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Role-aware file summaries give the best cost-effectiveness for file-level bug localization, beating file paths by up to 40% Hit@5 at far smaller footprint than raw source.

  2. Optimizing Code Runtime Performance through Context-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM code optimizer using control-flow-graph differences and retrieved examples reports 7.3% average runtime reduction on 116 C++ programs versus zero-shot GPT-4o.

Pith tools