Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Demystifying Issues, Causes and Solutions in LLM Open-Source Projects

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.16559 v2 pith:O4QUIFEY submitted 2024-09-25 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords issuesopen-sourcecausesprojectspractitionerssolutionsllmsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advancements of Large Language Models (LLMs), an increasing number of open-source software projects are using LLMs as their core functional component. Although research and practice on LLMs are capturing considerable interest, no dedicated studies explored the challenges faced by practitioners of LLM open-source projects, the causes of these challenges, and potential solutions. To fill this research gap, we conducted an empirical study to understand the issues that practitioners encounter when developing and using LLM open-source software, the possible causes of these issues, and potential solutions. We collected all closed issues from 15 LLM open-source projects and labelled issues that met our requirements. We then randomly selected 994 issues from the labelled issues as the sample for data extraction and analysis to understand the prevalent issues, their underlying causes, and potential solutions. Our study results show that (1) Model Issue is the most common issue faced by practitioners, (2) Model Problem, Configuration and Connection Problem, and Feature and Method Problem are identified as the most frequent causes of the issues, and (3) Optimize Model is the predominant solution to the issues. Based on the study results, we provide implications for practitioners and researchers of LLM open-source projects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Prompting in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Prompt Evolution in Software Repositories

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An empirical study of 1,262 prompt changes across 243 GitHub repositories shows that developers mainly add and modify prompt components during feature development, rarely document the changes, and sometimes introduce ...

  2. Adaptive Testing for LLM-Based Applications: A Diversity-based Approach

    cs.SE 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A farthest-first diversity-based selection method for prompt templates finds LLM failures faster than random selection, with compression distance giving the strongest average gains.

Pith tools